aganist this attack i think pathan and dhoni will be decent atleastJono said:India were criticised for playing 5 bowlers against England though. Its tricky. I'm not yet confident enough of having Pathan at 7, particularly since Dhoni is still unproven at test level too.
Sorry, where have I claimed to know what went on?Sanz said:You , who was neither watching nor in the middle.
That is easy to say with hindsight and a score of almost 400 on the board with 4 wickets down.biased indian said:aganist this attack i think pathan and dhoni will be decent atleast
alternative said:That was truly amazing stuff from Sehwag, absolutely trashing stuff..
i was just wondering about sehwag's landmark of scoring a 100 in session or so on.. was he aware of it??
EDIT: i know he didn't achieve that but i was just wondering if he knew it..
Can someone, in all seriousness, explain to me why someone who is good at something is a 'gun' in Aussie parlance?Jono said:Dravid you gun.
He missed another record - Fastest Test 100 by an Indian (74 balls by Azza and Kapil).alternative said:Thats interesting.. i thought all this time he didnt know and was worried about why Indian team management didnt bring it up earlier with him..
It just sounds good.luckyeddie said:Can someone, in all seriousness, explain to me why someone who is good at something is a 'gun' in Aussie parlance?
I understand that it derived from the fastest person at sheep-sh***ing, so there may be New Zealand connotations as well.