Not really. He did have an impressive first spell today.Arjun said:That he's been the best bowler shows how much the Indian pace attack has underperformed so far.
What do you make of this pitch? Too slow to get off quick? Or can the Indian batsmen negate that?pug said:Off to bed already??? Its only 12 and tommorow's sunday.
Oh well... wonder if there will any experimentation with batting orders. Would love to see Raina at no 3 or 4.
An impressive first spell where the Windies batted out a Test draw, followed by utter rubbish in the final overs. Even Irfan couldn't get it right then.pug said:Not really. He did have an impressive first spell today.
Pitch doesn't seem bad at all. Indian bowlers managed to move a lot at first but only at around 80-85 mph. Pathan was a couple of miles slower. I don't think the pitch should cause any real worries. The WI batsmen dug themselves into a hole and weren't helped by some superb fielding and bowling by the Indians.Arjun said:What do you make of this pitch? Too slow to get off quick? Or can the Indian batsmen negate that?
Sehwag, being Sehwag, may try to pinch-hit again, so he may not last too long. Kaif seems to get stuck quite often on such a pitch. The ball may not come on the bat so quickly, so running between wickets is the key.pug said:Pitch doesn't seem bad at all. Indian bowlers managed to move a lot at first but only at around 80-85 mph. Pathan was a couple of miles slower. I don't think the pitch should cause any real worries. The WI batsmen dug themselves into a hole and weren't helped by some superb fielding and bowling by the Indians.
Well, the ball was moving at first and Agarkar showed good control. He bowled accurately at greater pace than any other Indian bowler and was extremely economical.Arjun said:An impressive first spell where the Windies batted out a Test draw, followed by utter rubbish in the final overs. Even Irfan couldn't get it right then.
The pace at which he bowled isn't anything special, and it just shows how the rest of the attack, bar Irfan, has underperformed. Even though the ball was moving, the West Indians just got stuck in a block-and-leave mode that lasted all the way till the 20th over.pug said:Well, the ball was moving at first and Agarkar showed good control. He bowled accurately at greater pace than any other Indian bowler and was extremely economical.
Still - magnificent innings. Doubt they'll make a contest of it, but cracking all the same.adharcric said:Poor Sarwan. Oh well, I don't mind it THAT much.
Didn't realise how quickly the next innings started......though that terrible movie is still onSamuel_Vimes said:Still - magnificent innings. Doubt they'll make a contest of it, but cracking all the same.
Edit: Edwards maiden.
Be a real cricket fan and turn the crap off and put your match on.Arjun said:Didn't realise how quickly the next innings started......though that terrible movie is still on
If they hadn't stuck to the block-and-leave mode, Agarkar would've taken a 5-fer for sure. I usually bash him for being inconsistent, but this just seems to be a second coming of Agarkar, as if someone has put this touch of "senior bowler" responsibility in him. He's been regularly bowling a good line and moving the ball at approximately 85 mph. I'll take that.Arjun said:The pace at which he bowled isn't anything special, and it just shows how the rest of the attack, bar Irfan, has underperformed. Even though the ball was moving, the West Indians just got stuck in a block-and-leave mode that lasted all the way till the 20th over.
I'm not watching that movie.....luckily it got over at the second over. EDIT: These innings breaks seem really short here....adharcric said:Be a real cricket fan and turn the crap off and put your match on.
That just shows up the West Indian batting. Deano mentioned they lack the technique, and they're trying to hide it with their sleepy batting. I'm not too sure he'll last the full series, he never did in the many series he's played. That he's bowled better than his underperforming partners doesn't tell you enough, since he's still not even close to his opposite numbers in other teams, despite being around for so long.If they hadn't stuck to the block-and-leave mode, Agarkar would've taken a 5-fer for sure. I usually bash him for being inconsistent, but this just seems to be a second coming of Agarkar, as if someone has put this touch of "senior bowler" responsibility in him. He's been regularly bowling a good line and moving the ball at approximately 85 mph. I'll take that.