Don't think a draw's very likely. Too much bounce in the wicket.Seems we'll get in 90 overs every day here by the looks of it so far... doesn't bode well for our chances of getting a draw...
Yeah, India will have to bowl really well tomorrow to make a match out of this.Yeah that's why even 1 more wicket (especially of Kallis) would have been vital.
On topic:Harbhajan's series in 2001 was a perfectly relevant reply to the post which claimed Swann is better now than Harbhajan EVER was.
Not Murali, but with some distance the best spinner around these days.Lol @ the Harby comment.
Swann averaging 20-odd in 2010 has to be seen with some perspective regarding the strength of the opposition and the variations in his performances against B'desh and Pak and SA and Oz. You'd think he's Murali already seeing how some people rate him.
Bounce isn't really an issue. Its tennis ball, as the curator predicted.Don't think a draw's very likely. Too much bounce in the wicket.
Well you'd expect them to do a little better than 'not letting the opposition score quickly' winning the toss and bowling on this wicket.Ah well, at least India haven't let the South Africans score too quickly. Still South Africa's day though, no question.
I think the slowness might be just as much from the Indian bowlers than the wicket. Speedgun's had all three of them at around 80mph all day, often even less.Slow bounce however
What was the pitch like when England drew here last year?Don't think a draw's very likely. Too much bounce in the wicket.
Poetic justice recently he's been picking up wickets during some of the most rubbish spells of fast bowling.Sharma unlucky to not get more than 1 wicket here,
Zaheer was dissapointing today.
Probably our worst quick today.
That is true, India didn't make full use of the conditions, but that they haven't let South Africa really get away means that they only need a wicket or two to bring the match back into balance.Well you'd expect them to do a little better than 'not letting the opposition score quickly' winning the toss and bowling on this wicket.
Sigged.If we just get Kallis, I reckon we can get the rest for >80 runs. We're not gonna get the bastard though.
ThankyouOn topic:
VCS indeed made a valid point. But did Harby's great match make him the best spinner (bar W&M) during a solid period of time? Hard to tell....
Not Murali, but with some distance the best spinner around these days.
I have to disagree, plenty of balls have carried to head height to Dhoni, but slowly, as someone mentioned earlier, the bounce is "tennis ball"I think the slowness might be just as much from the Indian bowlers than the wicket. Speedgun's had all three of them at around 80mph all day, often even less.
I guess we won't know til South Africa bowl. Could be an iffy speedgun.
Perhaps, But still one who will average about 30 against the best sides, not higher quality than that. In all fairness, Shakib isn't far off, IMHO. Shakib averaged 21 in SA, 32 against India and 18 against NZ. He just hasn't had an opportunity of playing 6 tests against the quality of batting lineups that Swann faced.On topic:
VCS indeed made a valid point. But did Harby's great match make him the best spinner (bar W&M) during a solid period of time? Hard to tell....
Not Murali, but with some distance the best spinner around these days.
You do normally get results on pitches like these though. The real draw decks are the ones where edges fall short of first slip, although England did just about manage to save one here last year and obviously India's batting is excellent.Bounce isn't really an issue. Its tennis ball, as the curator predicted.
Haha yeah AWTA. That 3fa he picked up against Australia was hilarious.Poetic justice recently he's been picking up wickets during some of the most rubbish spells of fast bowling.