Nah they are ****.Bell and Prior are pretty damn awesome as well. None of our players are bad at playing spin though, so to say they are because we were **** at it 40 years ago is stupid.
Come back when you have half a clue.Nah they are ****.
Still ****.Come back when you have half a clue.
Could say the same about your posting in the lastStill ****.
Tee ****in' hee.Could say the same about your posting in the last24 hours4 years
Started in this thread tbph.I see the pissing contest has spewed over to this thread too. One for the ages.
Hey, come one its Shri, he's always this wrong.Hey come on its Marcuss. He whines.
You are such a hater. You can't stand it if people rate players you don't like. Haddin for example.Hey, come one its Shri, he's always this wrong.
Nah, people can rate Haddin all they like. In fact he's won me over this series by quite a long way.You are such a hater. You can't stand it if people rate players you don't like. Haddin for example.
Surely Pankaj SIngh must be looked at by the Indian selectors.Not at all. Actually, I reckon they could potentially be okay to Yadav, because he has got a bit of pace, but as for Mithun and Unadkat who at 80mph and do not move the ball - yeh, it could be brutal. As much as I despise him, I'd happily have Sreesanth in the team over any of those three (you can add Ishant to that too, actually).
My ideal situation would be to have an attack of Zaheer, Munaf, Praveen and Harbhajan. Praveen can bowl extensively with the new ball and then perhaps bowl with the wicket keeper up to the stumps in an attritional role, otherwise. Praveen can bolster the batting too. Actually, thinking about it, perhaps R Vinay Kumar would be a better pick than Praveen, as he has that 5kph extra that will make him less useless with the old ball, but again, I'm not too sure.