• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in South Africa 2013/14

Spark

Global Moderator
It's so weird, though. If you're going to play out the draw, you surely do it when Philander comes in, not when you need less than a run a ball for 19 deliveries?

Two top edges over the keeper and the game is done.
 

MrPrez

International Debutant
Yeah, I mean come-on. 19 deliveries, 3 wickets in hand - and you block it out? I would understand not trying to lift it over the keeper for six, but at least try to get singles and cash in on bad balls ffs.
 

kykweer.proteas

International Debutant
Yeah, I mean come-on. 19 deliveries, 3 wickets in hand - and you block it out? I would understand not trying to lift it over the keeper for six, but at least try to get singles and cash in on bad balls ffs.
I think it depends on what happens in durban. Steyn didnt want to be the guy to expose morkel and tahir. Going fornthe draw absolutely sucks, but w just need to win in durban now.

Also while steyn was being offered singles from bouncers... philander was forced to go over the top. It was a very nagative length the Indians were bowling to steyn.

I blame duminy, faf was just exhausted but duminy played a ****ing useless lazy shot to get out. How many chances this guy will get **** knows. I would rather have robbie p in the team.
 

MrPrez

International Debutant
Guy who interviewed Domingo told me that "Russ indicated was a collective decision but players on field empowered 2 decide too"

What the heck does that mean? That he's trying his best to cover up his own idiocy, I reckon.
 

akilana

International 12th Man
It's so weird, though. If you're going to play out the draw, you surely do it when Philander comes in, not when you need less than a run a ball for 19 deliveries?

Two top edges over the keeper and the game is done.
They started playing for the draw after Faf got out. I will blame them if they didn't go for the win if Faf was still in
 

akilana

International 12th Man
Yeah, I mean come-on. 19 deliveries, 3 wickets in hand - and you block it out? I would understand not trying to lift it over the keeper for six, but at least try to get singles and cash in on bad balls ffs.
With the SA taileders, you never know. They bat like rabbits caught in headlights when under pressure.
 

kykweer.proteas

International Debutant
Duminy is a better batsman and bowler than Robbie.
compared to the other guys in the team duminy has been a piss poor batsman recently.

in the last five games robbie p played he outperformed duminy.

Im just saying thats how crap duminy is bar one great innings.
 
Last edited:

akilana

International 12th Man
compared to the other guys in the team duminy has been a piss poor batsman recently.
He has always been. Apart from that epic hundred in Australia, he has done nothing in both tests and ODIs. Just hope he fails again and is kicked out of the team. It would be so annoying if he scores a 50 and keeps his place.
 

kykweer.proteas

International Debutant
He has always been. Apart from that epic hundred in Australia, he has done nothing in both tests and ODIs. Just hope he fails again and is kicked out of the team. It would be so annoying if he scores a 50 and keeps his place.
he is probably waiting for game time vs zim, bangla, nz and the netherlands... if we play those teams by all means... play jp.

but against the top teams he is dead weight. he averages 50 as a bowler too(recently, last ten games).. in tests and ODI's. no point keeping this guy.
 

rza

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
I dont understand South African fans who are criticising the team for going for the draw. India needed 3 balls to win the match, and we know it takes two balls to dismiss both Morkel and Tahir, especially with Morkel on one leg. Steyn hasnt been good with the bat for a long time now, so Philander needed to protect him, and I'm glad he did. Had the team lost the match then you would have laughed at them and called them chockers, and worse they would have lost the series considering light problems in Durban and the possibility of rain. All that good work would have been for nothing. And people think that this is ODI where u can just slog. Dhoni had every man on the boundary and bowlers were bowling bouncers, which cant be called wide, so the required runs were improbable.

South African fans with their fickle attitude are the reason why guys like Kallis are not getting the applauds they deserve, and why Amla will never win the Player of the Year. You criticise the team and even boo it when they did what the great Australian or West Indian teams have failed to do. And then we have Australians who claim Warne would have gone for the win. Didn't Lara chase the record against the same Australian team. They are trying to present this SA team as a weak team that doesnt deserve the number 1 position, yet ignore the fact that they scored 450 runs, and they have previously chased the second highest runs to win a test match.

This is a great achievement for SA and they dont deserve any criticism. Criticise India for failing to take 10 wickets in 4.5 sessions.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
1st Test: West Indies v Australia at Bridgetown, Apr 7-11, 2012 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
2nd Test: South Africa v Australia at Johannesburg, Nov 17-21, 2011 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

Saying "oh they shouldn't have gone for it because they might have been called chokers" is just a sign of underconfidence tbh. If they believed they could win - and for the majority of the chase they clearly did - then that shouldn't have bothered them.

I mean, we're not talking about 25 off 3 overs. We're talking 16. Most of that can be accrued with risk-free singles, many of which were on offer at the time.
 
Last edited:

kykweer.proteas

International Debutant
1st Test: West Indies v Australia at Bridgetown, Apr 7-11, 2012 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
2nd Test: South Africa v Australia at Johannesburg, Nov 17-21, 2011 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

Saying "oh they shouldn't have gone for it because they might have been called chokers" is just a sign of underconfidence tbh. If they believed they could win - and for the majority of the chase they clearly did - then that shouldn't have bothered them.

I mean, we're not talking about 25 off 3 overs. We're talking 16. Most of that can be accrued with risk-free singles, many of which were on offer at the time.
the singles were offered to vernon not to steyn. who had to face short wide balls. it was not easyonthepads balls he cohld plant the front foot and knock around.
 

kykweer.proteas

International Debutant
1st Test: West Indies v Australia at Bridgetown, Apr 7-11, 2012 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
2nd Test: South Africa v Australia at Johannesburg, Nov 17-21, 2011 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

Saying "oh they shouldn't have gone for it because they might have been called chokers" is just a sign of underconfidence tbh. If they believed they could win - and for the majority of the chase they clearly did - then that shouldn't have bothered them.

I mean, we're not talking about 25 off 3 overs. We're talking 16. Most of that can be accrued with risk-free singles, many of which were on offer at the time.
on the other side. does it prove they have confidence if they believe they will win in durban to take the series and decide that a draw will be good enough here?
 

rza

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
1st Test: West Indies v Australia at Bridgetown, Apr 7-11, 2012 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
2nd Test: South Africa v Australia at Johannesburg, Nov 17-21, 2011 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

Saying "oh they shouldn't have gone for it because they might have been called chokers" is just a sign of underconfidence tbh. If they believed they could win - and for the majority of the chase they clearly did - then that shouldn't have bothered them.

I mean, we're not talking about 25 off 3 overs. We're talking 16. Most of that can be accrued with risk-free singles, many of which were on offer at the time.
So Australia chased 310 in Wanderers so that makes South Africa weak and Australia better? 310 wasnt a record chase and its 148 runs short of what South Africa needed to chase, and we were 1 player short. This team chased 414 in Australia so theres no way anybody should call them weak. India played very negatively and they had to, to be fair to them, and every captain would have done what Dhoni did, each and every one of them, exept maybe for Ponting and he is in record for the second worst loss in Test cricket chase.

This team did what Viv's team couldnt do, and what Waugh's didnt even attempt to do. This team is right up there with the best, and the last thing they deserve is to be booed by thier own fans, otherwise we'll continue to have inferior batsmen like Clarke winning Player of the Year instead of Amla. Before you condemn me for calling Clarke inferior, check the test rankings.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
That's really strange thinking if so. They were playing a very much live and potentially historic Test, why worry about Durban?

Sure, if you lose the Test you can't win the series but conversely if you win the Test you can't lose the series.
 

Top