GoT_SpIn said:off topic: I would add you but my msn isn't letting me...add me then [/QUOTE]
Off Topic: Its not a particularly great idea to post your email address online in a forum.
Last edited:
GoT_SpIn said:off topic: I would add you but my msn isn't letting me...add me then [/QUOTE]
Off Topic: Its not a particularly great idea to post your email address online in a forum.
Thanks for quoting me thenpug said:Off Topic: Its not a particularly great idea to post your email address online in a forum.
Ur welcome.GoT_SpIn said:Thanks for quoting me then
done.GoT_SpIn said:off topic: I would add you but my msn isn't letting me...add me then xiw4life at hotmail dot com
This was posted almost 15 days ago but them India has gone in with Options 2 and 3 in this series so far in the 2 tests. Now, do you think that India will try out Option 1 in the 3rd test.TIF said:It has all come down to which bowling combination India takes at the moment -
Option 1 - 3 pacers + 1 spinner - This will have Harbhajan, sitting out and only Kumble playing, and Pathan, Zaheer and Agarkar(or RP Singh) will play. The 2nd spin option will be provided by Sehwag, Tendulkar and Yuvraj combined. Can be a useful option if the track is a one which assits pacers.
Option 2 - 2 pacers + 2 spinners - This is the combination with which India goes. Also, the pitches in Pakistan are very similar to those in India, even if a pitch is there which assists pacers, it will break down as the match progresses and the cracks will develop gradually on the pitch and it will start assisting spinners. In the sub-continent, a pace-freindly track can stay that way for only 2-3 days before finally giving away to spinners. So, India should go in with 2 pacers + 2 spinners with Ganguly providing the extra seam bowling option.
Also, dont at this suggestion - Even Dhoni has been known to bowl some medium-pace in the nets and if India might need an extra seam option, trying out Dhoni for 4-5 overs wont be a bad idea. We can have Dravid keeping for sometime. Taibu, recently did it for Zimbabwe almost 2 years ago against Sri Lanka with Utseya taking the gloves while Taibu bowled and Taibu kept when the other bowlers bowled.
Option 3 - 2 pacers + 2 spinners + 1 all-rounder(Irfan Pathan) - With the emergence of Irfan Pathan as a all-rounder and Dhoni also to provide runs at the lower-order with even Agarkar chipping in with some useful lower-order runs, this wont be a bad idea after all. We will go in with a strong bowling line-up and if this means only playing 5 regular batsmen, look at the batting to follow - Dhoni(He is a power-player), Pathan(He is an all-rounder), Agarkar(He has a test 100 at lords to his credit and has scored the fastest ODI 50 by an Indian), Zaheer(Highest test score by a no.11), Kumble(3 test 50s to his credit), Harbhajan(A useful 32-ball 44 against Sri Lanka way back in 2001), so these 6 players can fit in the batting of 3 regular batsmen. Ignoring Zaheer, Kumble and Harbhajan as they havent done too much with the bat, still we will have a batting line-up right down to no.8.
The teams in each of the 3 options will look like -
Option 1:
Sehwag
Gambhir/Jaffer
Dravid
Tendulkar
Laxman
Yuvraj
Dhoni(w)
Pathan
Agarkar/RP Singh
Zaheer
Kumble
Sehwag+Tendulkar+Yuvraj=2nd spinner
Option 2:
Sehwag
Gambhir/Jaffer
Dravid
Tendulkar
Laxman
Ganguly
Dhoni(w)
Pathan
Zaheer
Harbhajan
Kumble
Ganguly+MS Dhoni=3rd medium pacer
Option 3:
Sehwag
Gambhir/Jaffer
Dravid
Tendulkar
Laxman
Dhoni(w)
Pathan
Agarkar
Zaheer
Harbhajan
Kumble
Dhoni+Pathan+Agarkar=6th and 7th Batsman.
It may have been too late to do anything about Faisalabad. Once you remove the grass, you cant put it back. THAT needs time.Tony Blade said:I would have thought they would have tried to make the Faisalabad pitch more bowler friendly after the intese criticism following the Lahore test match..
.
The 2004 wickets were prepared by an outsider.Tony Blade said:plus the last two tests in 2004 were played on lively pitches, where we had the same captain.
.
Oh yes. I agree.yohanna said:However i must say that i'm surprised at Inzi/Woolmer's defensive tactics.This Pak team is much much stronger than the one that played India last time around, then why was there a need for such negative approach??
Are you implying that India has been lucky to maintain a draw thus far, simply due to these dead tracks? Akhtar and Naved-ul-Hasan would certainly have received more assistance on lively tracks, but so would Pathan. Zaheer was generating prodigious swing and nothing needs to be said about RP Singh's bowling ... on a lively pitch they would've troubled the Pakistani batsmen as well. The biggest weapons in the bowling department were Kumble and Harbhajan, and they were negated by the pitch, so that really needs to be taken into account (they are by far more destructive than Kaneria). That said, I don't think there's a huge gap between these teams, India being slightly ahead as a test team and Pakistan slightly ahead as a one-day team (at the moment). As an Indian fan I'm inclined to say that the Indian one-day side is improving very rapidly and will be better than Pak soon, but for that we need to match Pakistan's two biggest assets: an abundance of all-round performers and a deadly tearaway pacer. Hopefully the Karachi pitch will have some life in it, even if it's close to a greentop it might be fine. This Indian team isn't incompetent against seam, swing and pace; at the same time, this Pakistani team is a professional unit that will give anyone a run for their money.SJS said:Cricket/fans/sponsors may have all lost out in these two tests but India are sitting pretty I think and for that we have to thank the curator to some extent.
Whether Kumble is better than Kaneria is debatable, perhaps Kumble has the edge as he's experianced, however as far as Harbhajan is concerned, Kaneria is a far better bowler than Harbhajan!adharcric said:. The biggest weapons in the bowling department were Kumble and Harbhajan, and they were negated by the pitch, so that really needs to be taken into account (they are by far more destructive than Kaneria). .
Tony Blade said:Great, now Shoaib is doubtful for the 3rd test.
mayadevi said:Great , now Akhtar joins the injury list, he's the third player that can miss the third test match with same old excuse!
If the Pakistan team is so frightened to play against India, then why the hell they even bother to host them??
How? He seems to be, for me, the main danger to the Indian batting.What-A-Player said:Infact, Shoaib ; not playing can be a blessing in disguise for Pakistan
pug said:How? He seems to be, for me, the main danger to the Indian batting.