Tony Blade said:You really feel for the bowlers on these pitches. They've kept it in the right areas and have bowled tight lines without much reward.
There is no point in going for a high run rate right from the beginning.Sanz said:Hahaha, with this rate it will take rest of the test match to score 470 runs..
True but only taken him what 6 years? ( not sure). Hopefully he caries on in this manner, he provides entertaining cricket.Neil Pickup said:What's the scariest thing for me is that he's threatening to grow a brain and play innings that are still coruscating in their, well, bloodlust - but appropriate to the situation. Defending, leaving... and then exploding.
It could be quite something over the next year or so - I'm certainly tempted by a few day fives next summer.
Indeed, 2 matches so far and zero wicket for the mighty one man pace attackmarc71178 said:Akhtar on his own is better than the Indian pace attack.
Yeah because obviously the pitches favour pace bowler heaps don't theyvandemataram said:Indeed, 2 matches so far and zero wicket for the mighty one man pace attack
uh. Sit back and enjoy Dravid's immense concentration. I must say, the ultra slow motion display is amazing.Sanz said:Hahaha, with this rate it will take rest of the test match to score 470 runs..
When the combined effort of a whole bowling attack yield just one wkt in each test matches, then it must be said that the pace attack is a world class one!pug said:Is it just me, or do the Pakistani pace bowlers seem a class above Indian bowlers?
No offense, but are you actually watching the match in television?nehrafan said:When the combined effort of a whole bowling attack yield just one wkt in each test matches, then it must be said that the pace attack is a world class one!
Yes i'm, and i think the most impressive bowler in the match has been RPS.pug said:No offense, but are you actually watching the match in television?
Anyone who actually saw the test match would know that Akhtar bowled better than any Indian pacer..and that includes Singhvandemataram said:Indeed, 2 matches so far and zero wicket for the mighty one man pace attack
There is no way in hell that Pak can think of winning a test match against India without Inzamam.nehrafan said:All eyes will be on the Karachi match, where Pakistan might miss its captain, Rana and Malik coz of injury .The absence of Inzi alone will give India a huge advantage, as even on batting track India will be able to beat a weakened Pak team missing its captain Inzi (which happen to be the backbone of Pak batting lineup).
Jinxer.Nnanden said:Get some wickets already!