• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Pakistan

Xuhaib

International Coach
Razzaq for Rana is not a bad move. I mean Rana isnt miles ahead of Razzaq especially at the test level.

Razzaq easily the more superior batsman.
 

nehrafan

Banned
Rana Naveed might not be a great bowler but still he is million times better than Razzak.

Why has Razzak replaced Rana is beyond me, an extra batter on this wkt isn't required.

India and Pakistan have adopted diff approach here, India wen't into the match with an addiotional bowler while Pak went into the match with an additional batter.

I think India want to win this match while Pakistan want to make sure that it remains a draw.
 

nehrafan

Banned
Xuhaib said:
Razzaq for Rana is not a bad move. I mean Rana isnt miles ahead of Razzaq especially at the test level.

Razzaq easily the more superior batsman.
I am a big fan of Razzak, as i love his batting in ODI, but i must say that Razzak is hardly a bowler he once was. A younger Razzak was good for test matches as an allrounder, but now i think Razzak can only make the test team coz of his batting
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
R.P Singh looks good like Deano said "He bowls 2-3 wicket taking balls every over".

This may be exagerating (typical of Deano) but he is still quite usefull.
 

Mecnun

U19 Debutant
Comma said:
This certainly reeks of a defensive mindset by the Pak captain.
Agree and it is extremely foolish IMO. Gul instead of Razzaq would have been a better move. Even Yasir Arafat instead of Razzler would have been a better move. We are packing our team with bits and pieces players and in tests you need 'specialists'.
 
Mecnun said:
Agree and it is extremely foolish IMO. Gul instead of Razzaq would have been a better move. Even Yasir Arafat instead of Razzler would have been a better move. We are packing our team with bits and pieces players and in tests you need 'specialists'.
Bob loves Allrounders, when he was the coach of SA, the SA team was packed with AR's.Therefore i'm not surprised to see Malik,Afridi and Razzak , all in one Pak team.
 

Mecnun

U19 Debutant
vandemataram said:
Indian pace attack has great depth. Out goes Agarkar and comes in RP Singh, a great talent!!
I would not quite go that far but give the lad a chance. I did not think he looked all that special to be honest.
 

Mecnun

U19 Debutant
Harbie was the one who again looked like getting a wicket but I bet pitch is drying out and becoming easy to bat on until it crumbles .
 

a10khan

School Boy/Girl Captain
Comma said:
This certainly reeks of a defensive mindset by the Pak captain.
You know what, its not that. Abdur Razzaq is his best pal and he has seldom dropped him when fully fit. Either that, or he thinks very highly of Abdur as a test bowler.
 

JustTool

State 12th Man
in case you did not notice it was because india went with 5 bowlers. make sure you send ganguly a card on valentine's day :laugh:


Sanz said:
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: So why are the openers not in the team now ?? Let me guess this time it is Zaheer and are RP Singh's damn connections.
 

PY

International Coach
Sedate effort from Afridi so far, a mere SR of 78.4. :)

Not bad score so far, these two still in at the end of the day and from what I hear I reckon it'll just be Pakistan's day but if they lose any more then it has to be India in the ascendency.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Arjun said:
In that case, why not have one Munaf Patel in the team in place of Ganguly and Yuvraj? Not only is he decently fast and also more than a few inches taller than Agarkar (and a lot better built), he's also a good hard hitter of the ball.
This is Test Cricket, where batsmen are needed, not hitters.
 

Top