Yep, had it just clipping but without Hawkeye probably shouldnt have been givenI don't think that's as clear cut a bad decision as they're making out. Definitely could have hit leg stump IMO. Benefit probably should have gone with the batsman, yeah, but it wasn't a howler.
Yeah sort of agree. I think its the wrong decision, and hence there's no real excuse for that, but the commentators are exaggerating it a bit.I don't think that's as clear cut a bad decision as they're making out. Definitely could have hit leg stump IMO. Benefit probably should have gone with the batsman, yeah, but it wasn't a howler.
Nah Ryder get's that. Plays brilliantly and then plays a 5 cent shot. Ropable really, despite getting a 100.Gary Baxter is more of a berk now.
TBF it was only clipping the stump.Hawkeye says out. No decision that Hawkeye vindicates can possibly be that egregious. I've seen a lot worse decisions.
Well if they were all given out like that it'd be fine but in the interests of match-to-match consistency, you wouldn't expect to get out like that.Hawkeye says out. No decision that Hawkeye vindicates can possibly be that egregious. I've seen a lot worse decisions.
Yeah, fair call. Looking at the replays, it wasn't quite as bad as my first impression live.Well if they were all given out like that it'd be fine but in the interests of match-to-match consistency, you wouldn't expect to get out like that.
As I said, I don't think it was as bad a decision as the commentators were making out by any stretch, but it shouldn't have been given.
Good slogger but untested at this level.How good a bat is McGlashan?
Proving true.All was needed was one and others would come.