No they're at least 60 runs short.Just got home having not seen a ball all day. Couple of questions;
1) Is 192 a decent score considering the pitch conditions?
2) Were NZ terrible or were India just really good or was it just a really really difficult wicket?
3) Is the pitch still looking as good for bowling or has it flattened out?
I would say 220 would have been par. We batted poorly, they bowled well and the pitch was a bit of minefieldJust got home having not seen a ball all day. Couple of questions;
1) Is 192 a decent score considering the pitch conditions?
2) Were NZ terrible or were India just really good or was it just a really really difficult wicket?
3) Is the pitch still looking as good for bowling or has it flattened out?
pretty sure that's jono and dan.good to see Harry Potter and Dumbledore made it to the game
Haha, so our worst nightmare came true then aye . Call me cynical, but I was totally resigned to the fact Dhoni would win the toss again and it would start green and flatten out. Crucial toss. In the few overs I've seen, Indian batsmen look pretty comfortable and Boult has not been accurate at all. Bugger.I would say 220 would have been par. We batted poorly, they bowled well and the pitch was a bit of minefield