He did well in one series against the West Indies, and all of a sudden he's obviously better at taking wickets despite the fact that Wagner takes significantly more wickets per match?So he's better at taking wickets and not conceding runs but not a better bowler. Uh-huh. He's done much more for the 3rd seamer spot than Wagner.
Yeah, struggling to see how Taylor's tenure was the problem.a reign with more success than the vettori reign. a reign which ended with an overseas victory.
Taylor wasn't part of the unholy alliance or the agribusiness boom.Yeah, struggling to see how Taylor's tenure was the problem.
Wagner has played in several series where at first change he's acted as a total pressure release valve. If anything he bowls more like a part timer than Corey, being erratic and occaisionally producing magic out of nowhere but having no consistency.He did well in one series against the West Indies, and all of a sudden he's obviously better at taking wickets despite the fact that Wagner takes significantly more wickets per match?
Neil Wagner, 7 balls bowled, all pies.Three balls bowled, two of them far too short.
sodhi cant turn it CONSISTENTLY thats ALWAYS MY FALLBACK ARGUMENThey blocky, i thought sodhi couldn't turn it
tbh I didn't think he really could either consistently considering he barely managed anything during the WI series.hey blocky, i thought sodhi couldn't turn it
Except pretty much no one turns it in NZ. Well outside hamilton at leasttbh I didn't think he really could either consistently considering he barely managed anything during the WI series.