It's very obvious that neither the fact he scored 79 should disguise the fact he was poor after the rain, nor that should disguise the fact that he played well for 79 - far better than some of the nonsense we've had since (good as the bowling's been).Nah, if you look back through the thread then a couple members commented on his weak little drive and I think it was Richard who said that it was pretty obvious Vaughan didn't want to be out there.
Fully agree.**** Fox Sports. **** them completely. Idiots.
I just about caught a glimpse of that when turning around from the computer to the TV and thought I was seeing things. I guess not92MPH from Sreesanth!
I wasn't denying that he played well for 79, but he threw his wicket away when his team needed him to bat out the day and as the captain it was a very poor dismissal. Looks even worse now that England have capitulated like this.It's very obvious that neither the fact he scored 79 should disguise the fact he was poor after the rain, nor that should disguise the fact that he played well for 79 - far better than some of the nonsense we've had since (good as the bowling's been).
92MPH from Sreesanth! And some very wide wides too...
8 down for 46. Astounding, good as the bowling was.Disgraceful.