I am a huge critic of Cook but I am pretty sure that his tactics don't involve the bowlers sending down ****FFS Cook, please just resign.
He did that for the entirety of his first spell and looked pretty good, but there is no point having him bowl short on this kind of pitch.Saw Plunkett bowl at Lords against Middlesex and was quite impressed
England have picked him to do a job but have obviously forgotten to tell him to bowl at least a couple of balls in the batsman's half in the meantime
Feel a bit sorry for him to be honest. The short stuff is OK as a bit of a change for a short period when nothing is happening with a more traditional approach, but what he has been told to do (for long periods) all summer (on UNRESPONSIVE pitches, remember) is just ridiculous.Saw Plunkett bowl at Lords against Middlesex and was quite impressed
England have picked him to do a job but have obviously forgotten to tell him to bowl at least a couple of balls in the batsman's half in the meantime
does he have a big heart too?Plunkett is so similar to Siddle, a fit pace bowler who can run in and bowl with full intensity whole day. And can bat a bit as well.
I don't know who was responsible for that last over if it wasn't Cook? You don't go round the wicket with that field if the Captain doesn't want you to try and bounce the batsmen with advance warning.I am a huge critic of Cook but I am pretty sure that his tactics don't involve the bowlers sending down ****
I've been working out the minimum we need here by assuming anything less than 220-230 in 40 overs is a do-able ODI chase for England. Subtracting the time for the change-over, there's 60 overs to go, so the next 10 overs are crucial.So what's the highest RR people think we should go after?
Ironically this is one situation a certain someone actually would have been very useful