vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
Be interesting to compare England's ODI record at home up to July 31, and August onwards.
No it's not, rankings are based purely on statistical data, not on how good or bad the make up of a particular side happens to be.It's stupid that NZ are rated two spots below England.
Spot on. And if Rohit continues his ****, just throw the gauntlet to Pujara. We could use a stable number 4 now that our number 3 has turned into a jack-off jimmy.Rahane's really done well to get after Anderson this whole tour, those straight sixes are such a delight to watch.
I say Rahane should be permanent opener and we send Rohit back to number 4, it works out better for both bats.
I think that actually shows that for all the grumbling etc about how bad England are at ODIs, actual results haven't been as bad as is being made out.It's stupid that NZ are rated two spots below England.
What's our record since Trott's been out the side?We won in the UAE and New Zealand last time we went to each tbf. Played seven won six actually. In fact, post world cup we only lost two of our first nine series (both in India). We were pretty good for a while but post Champions Trophy it's all gone to ****.
Notably the completely go to **** stage coincided with our completely go to **** stage in tests, which people seem to be conveniently forgetting when it comes to deciding everything is wrong with our philosophies and team selection in limited overs.
Played 17 won 6. Team records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN CricinfoWhat's our record since Trott's been out the side?
We only ever lost one bilateral series with it though, and if Bell hadn't been wrongly given out stumped in the CT final trophy, we probably would've won that too. A top three who, on average, scored at about five an over is not at all an issue when everyone from 4 down to about 9 can score at 7+ with ease.No he wasn't bad at all, Cook/Bell/Trott absolutely was bad/muddled thinking though.
This is just so misinformed. He's been comfortably our best batsman over the past two or three years. He doesn't score enough hundreds but he's actually been incredibly consistent. Slipped in form a bit recently (like everyone else too) but not nearly to the degree of others who are culpable such as Cook, Morgan, Root and previously Bopara. In fact, for all the talk of Morgan being our best one day batsman for a few years, his results have been incredibly disappointing in comparison with Bell.Bell's the problem. ****e at ODIs and always has been.
Kevin PietersenIn fairness, Trescothick is the only batsman in English ODI history who was good at converting starts into 100s. But yeah, Bell's conversion rate is particularly piss poor.