• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in England 2014

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
I really, really, really want Woakes to be good, but I get the feeling he's almost guaranteed to be that guy who bowls really solid spells without much luck and comes away with dodgy looking stats and is always under threat.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I really, really, really want Woakes to be good, but I get the feeling he's almost guaranteed to be that guy who bowls really solid spells without much luck and comes away with dodgy looking stats and is always under threat.
See based on what I've seen, he won't be "unlucky". He's just sort of up and down and, okay, he's quickish, but he still looks reasonably easy to play.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
I really, really, really want Woakes to be good, but I get the feeling he's almost guaranteed to be that guy who bowls really solid spells without much luck and comes away with dodgy looking stats and is always under threat.
I don't really think he'll be in the side for long.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
England's bowling depends a lot on Broad and Anderson. The Indians need to make the most of what they get off the others. Unfortunately, they've lost too many to the top two, while Rahane and Dhoni are making the most of the rest.
 

Top