• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Australia

pup11

International Coach
Seriously Roy just ain't good enough to play test cricket purely as a batsman yeah if he could have added some depth to the team with his bowling then it still could have been a bit more bearable (but his bowling sucks too), it would be a lot better to a gamble with Noffke rather than Symonds and if Australia are too inclined on having a batsman who can bowl a bit then even the likes of Katich, D.Hussey or Hodge (yeah i know their bowling won't make any batsmen lose sleep but they offer a lot more with the bat when compared to Symonds).
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
Seriously Roy just ain't good enough to play test cricket purely as a batsman yeah if he could have added some depth to the team with his bowling then it still could have been a bit more bearable (but his bowling sucks too), it would be a lot better to a gamble with Noffke rather than Symonds and if Australia are too inclined on having a batsman who can bowl a bit then even the likes of Katich, D.Hussey or Hodge (yeah i know their bowling won't make any batsmen lose sleep but they offer a lot more with the bat when compared to Symonds).
What if they forgot to take their sleeping pills and left it on the bathroom counter and are too lazy to get out of bed?
 

archie mac

International Coach
Seriously Roy just ain't good enough to play test cricket purely as a batsman yeah if he could have added some depth to the team with his bowling then it still could have been a bit more bearable (but his bowling sucks too), it would be a lot better to a gamble with Noffke rather than Symonds and if Australia are too inclined on having a batsman who can bowl a bit then even the likes of Katich, D.Hussey or Hodge (yeah i know their bowling won't make any batsmen lose sleep but they offer a lot more with the bat when compared to Symonds).
I think he is doing a fine job tbh, looks like he belongs these days:)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Seriously Roy just ain't good enough to play test cricket purely as a batsman yeah if he could have added some depth to the team with his bowling then it still could have been a bit more bearable (but his bowling sucks too), it would be a lot better to a gamble with Noffke rather than Symonds and if Australia are too inclined on having a batsman who can bowl a bit then even the likes of Katich, D.Hussey or Hodge (yeah i know their bowling won't make any batsmen lose sleep but they offer a lot more with the bat when compared to Symonds).
I can't believe I'm doing this as I've been the most vocal critic of Andrew Symonds in the past, even when he's done well, but I think you under-rate his bowling a bit. I don't think his batting is good enough to be a test #6, but within the context of the Australian side, not even I think his selection is the most disgraceful thing ever. His bowling is a lot better than I thought it'd be at test level - he bowls a bit quicker than I thought he could and swings the ball with decent control. I've seen Sri Lanka select players as a specialist pacers who were worse bowlers than Symonds, even if his action looks dire and he has no run-up.

He's not really a test cricketer IMO and I probably wouldn't pick him if I got the chance, but with the flat pitches in Australia and the strength of Australia's 1-5 + Gilchrist, I can see why he's picked. If Australia pile up a big score amongst the first five batsmen, he is capable of really "rubbing it in" by hitting a tired attack around on a flat pitch. His bowling is definitely good enough for someone who bats in the top 6 as a fifth option (even if I don't think his batting is) and the role he plays is actually a pretty reasonable one within the current team.

Honestly, I'd still pick Noffke ahead of him. And honestly, I still can't stand watching him play and hope he fails whenever he goes out to bat. I certainly couldn't see any other test team worth their salt picking him, and that's a strange thing to say about a player in the best team in the world in a pivotal role, but I think he fits in with what the Australian team need at #6 at the moment given their relative batting and bowling strengths as well as the state of the pitches in the country. I "get" his selection, even if I don't really agree with it, whereas I was religiously opposed to the principle of it before.
 

TheLad

School Boy/Girl Captain
Watching his innings today he appears to be playing away from his body through the offside. Hasn't caused him any problems yet, but you never know.
But it has, he got a thick edge to a revesr swinger wide outside offstump that flew through a vacant third slip and one that came up short to Dhoni. Its caused him trouble early in his innings.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
They lost this Test on day 2
The thing with Australia is that you have to keep performing. You lose steam for a session or two and you can fall behind drastically in the game. Australia keeps coming at you and that makes them the strong team that they are.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Kumble gets Clarke courtesy experience. Clarke charged forward. Seeing it, Kumble bowled it a bit slower and got Clarke. Top stuff.
 
Last edited:

Top