Evermind
International Debutant
PWNED, I must say.It seems like we havent been introduced. I am tooextracool and this is how i post.
PWNED, I must say.It seems like we havent been introduced. I am tooextracool and this is how i post.
Well whatever your definition of luck is, the bottom line is that when externalities come into the question(i.e poor umpiring, winning the toss or bad weather), then there is a different degree of unfairness for the opposing team. As such one of those has already come into the equation and has hurt India far more than Australia. You can for example say that Dravid or the individual batsman was lucky for being dropped or caught of the no ball, but you cannot say that the Indian team on the whole has been lucky, because they were benefitting from ineptitude from the opposing side rather than externalities.nobody is saying Aussies have had bad luck
but India have had good luck... (which i understand is normal..in the game)
as said, luck is luck.. i understand it was Australias fault for a lot of them.. but it is still luck nonetheless.. obviously if you're complaining about umpires then you can't say anything because the umpires haven't evened out the luck.. it's been luck given by AussiesWell whatever your definition of luck is, the bottom line is that when externalities come into the question(i.e poor umpiring, winning the toss or bad weather), then there is a different degree of unfairness for the opposing team. As such one of those has already come into the equation and has hurt India far more than Australia. You can for example say that Dravid or the individual batsman was lucky for being dropped or caught of the no ball, but you cannot say that the Indian team on the whole has been lucky, because they were benefitting from ineptitude from the opposing side rather than externalities.
I do not understand a concept of a team 'giving luck' by playing poorly. Whatever you want to call it, the point is that many seem be indicating in this thread that the 'luck has evened out'. It has not because one team has been inept in the field and allowed the other team to take advantage of the situation. This is completely different from an umpire costing a team wickets from actual skill.as said, luck is luck.. i understand it was Australias fault for a lot of them.. but it is still luck nonetheless.. obviously if you're complaining about umpires then you can't say anything because the umpires haven't evened out the luck.. it's been luck given by Aussies
it's still luck though, that was what matt's point was.. and india have taken advantage of it (sort of)
AWTAI do not understand a concept of a team 'giving luck' by playing poorly. Whatever you want to call it, the point is that many seem be indicating in this thread that the 'luck has evened out'. It has not because one team has been inept in the field and allowed the other team to take advantage of the situation. This is completely different from an umpire costing a team wickets from actual skill.
i dont think it has evened out for India.. but atleast dropped catches/close catches/no balls in some way has given India a bit of luck... which is better than not.. so atleast they will feel... ok maybe SOME justice has been served (since Aussies rarely drop any and Midge never bowled a no ball bar that delivery etc.)I do not understand a concept of a team 'giving luck' by playing poorly. Whatever you want to call it, the point is that many seem be indicating in this thread that the 'luck has evened out'. It has not because one team has been inept in the field and allowed the other team to take advantage of the situation. This is completely different from an umpire costing a team wickets from actual skill.
It was good wasn't it - especially with the companion/contrast piece that was Laxman's effort. Both represented what good Test batting is about.Loved Dravid's innings. Inspiring determination.
Lee swung the new ball pretty consistently today. By consistently I mean the majority of deliveries for his entire opening spell. Basically the exact opposite of what you said yesterday - "Brett Lee has never swung the red ball conventionally".Ball swung away a touch. As said earlier it was one of a marginal number of balls that Lee swung all day, a comparable statistic to his test career in general.
Yep, delivery of the game so far. Totally unplayable.Simply look at the angle Jaffer attempted to play it at. Sensational delivery, second best of the series to date IMO, after the Zaheer ball to Ponting.
Ball of the series for me. Ponting perhaps could have gone back and played the ball extremely late, but there is nothing anyone could have done about the jaffer by Lee ()Yep, delivery of the game so far. Totally unplayable.
Lol, was it Clark or Clarke who gave you ball back mate?LOL @ Channel Nine showing my blue/white beachball escaping onto the field, only for Clarke to give it back, hit a chick in the head and some fool punch it to security.
Cheers Clarkey!
It was Clarke.Lol, was it Clark or Clarke who gave you ball back mate?
Btw its seriously dumb on part of CA to ban the beach balls, i know some idiot once tried to punch the ball and instead whacked his fist into a lady's jaw but that was just a freak accident.
Yeah just goes onto show how much Lee has evolved as a bowler, its just unbelievable to think what Lee could have achieved by now if he would have shown this sort patience and guile from a younger age, but then i guess maturity comes with age.Yep, delivery of the game so far. Totally unplayable.