• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Australia 2014-5

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Nah, disagree. The way DRS works with the "There has to be 190% proof that the on field umpire was a fool" results in the third umpire generally not reversing decisions like those even if it's clear that it's not out. Ends up making both on field and third umpire look like nincompoops.
Depends on instance to instance tho. Sometimes technology cannot catch something for sure or causes slight doubt either way. But I'd say atleast 9 out 10 times this one would have overturned.

Tough to see what doubt could be there.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
You're blaming the lack of DRS, which is what I was referring to when I said it wouldn't have made a difference with the second Vijay lbw
I'm not blaming anything. I'm saying it's absurd to not be using technology that makes the game fairer. India should be at least 1, if not 2 more wickets down.

Surprising that India don't wanna use DRS innit? Seeing they have **** bowlers. 8-)
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Depends on instance to instance tho. Sometimes technology cannot catch something for sure or causes slight doubt either way. But I'd say atleast 9 out 10 times this one would have overturned.

Tough to see what doubt could be there.
There was a very vague noise on Snicko before it hit the shoulder.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
The longer these 2 go the chances of a win increase.

But a wicket and there could be collapse too.

Very interestingly poised but draw seems the most likely to me right now.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm not blaming anything. I'm saying it's absurd to not be using technology that makes the game fairer. India should be at least 1, if not 2 more wickets down.

Surprising that India don't wanna use DRS innit? Seeing they have **** bowlers. 8-)
This is worse than sandy vag. Did all the sand from Adelaide's beaches get sucked in this morning?

Come on, now. It's one decision. We didn't throw this much of a fit until we got screwed over 10 times as much and ended up losing Sydney 08. #NeverForget
 

viriya

International Captain
I'm not blaming anything. I'm saying it's absurd to not be using technology that makes the game fairer. India should be at least 1, if not 2 more wickets down.
I'm all for DRS but Dhawan might be at 100* - you never know.. since it's not all against Aus no point going on about it.
 

Antihippy

International Debutant
I'm all for DRS but Dhawan might be at 100* - you never know.. since it's not all against Aus no point going on about it.
Why not? I don't mind if dhawan is still playing if he got an incorrect decision, but we're not the one forcing the other guy to not use drs.
 

Top