Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Had two innings; scored 44 and 0. Don't think they'll be going in the scrapbook tbh.Played well in SA...
Had two innings; scored 44 and 0. Don't think they'll be going in the scrapbook tbh.Played well in SA...
Which they likely will I think. The talent pool is massive.True. But most Aussies were convinced that the best XI wasn't being chosen ever. I mean we had Steve Smith in our top 6 and Xavier Doherty played some Tests!
India on paper appear quite good, I suppose they are going to have to back the likes of Rahane, Pujara, Rohit etc soon and hope a couple of them develop into test class batsman.
Ha, Spikey's a tough crowd.Cowan, Mash, Haddin, Lyon all pretty obvious weak points that I think most would agree with, Cowan and Marsh in part because they're so new and haven't put up the results say Warner have, Lyon in part because of his 9 tests so far conditions have meant in most of them he's been reduced to nothing/tail cleaning, so it's hard to judge him. From then I always said one ton wasn't gonna change my view on Ponting. Maybe Hussey. Starc obviously.
I think think all of the batting bar Clarke obviously is pretty unsettled. Top three are n00bs who have started in an array of different ways, and Ponting/Hussey are coming out of extended periods of crapness but are still under the hammer slightly.Ha, Spikey's a tough crowd.
So basically Warner, Clarke, Hussey and the seamers are ok?
Well by weak point I mean 'element of doubt' and well one series against a ****ing mess of a team is hardly that prestigious is it? 2 years of **** from the batting order isn't gonna be forgiven because Clarke-h hit 329. Lyon might be harsh. It's really nothing to do with him, he's been unlucky in that he's hardly been needed. And of course everyone in this team is pretty much new bar Ponting, Clarke, Hussey and HaddinHa, Spikey's a tough crowd.
So basically Warner, Clarke, Hussey and the seamers are ok?
Personally I look forward to said collapse featuring a Dhoni cover-drive off the second new ball to second slipCan see thes two staying in until it looks like Australia will have to bat again, then all of a sudden they get out, India collapse and Aus win by an innings and 8 runs
Haha yes. That's exceedingly likely to happen.Can see thes two staying in until it looks like Australia will have to bat again, then all of a sudden they get out, India collapse and Aus win by an innings and 8 runs
I think that shot needs its own name; "cover drive" doesn't really give an apt description. Can we just call it a dhoni or something?Personally I look forward to said collapse featuring a Dhoni cover-drive off the second new ball to second slip
I'd probably agree with you, but before the series a lot of folk were saying "It's India's best chance to win in Oz ever" and, well they've come up a bit short. Have to give some credit to the chaps who've stood up to make that happen.Well by weak point I mean 'element of doubt' and well one series against a ****ing mess of a team is hardly that prestigious is it? 2 years of **** from the batting order isn't gonna be forgiven because Clarke-h hit 329. Lyon might be harsh. It's really nothing to do with him, he's been unlucky in that he's hardly been needed. And of course everyone in this team is pretty much new bar Ponting, Clarke, Hussey and Haddin
It rarely actually goes to cover though. Slip shovel?Cover-shovel.
Looking at the scorecard Clark performed just fine with 6 wickets in the match. Tait was a weaklink, Johnson was one in the second innings but really the bowlers weren't the main problem. They got India out for 330 and 294, that is not too bad, our batsmen in the first dig was the problem. 212 was never enough.If we compare the pace quartet Australia played in Perth 4 years ago to this one, Lee is equivalent to Siddle, Clark equivalent to Hilfenhaus, Johnson equivalent to Harris and Tait equivalent to Starc. I think the difference has been made by Starc's solid performance in contrast with Tait's no show and Hilfenhaus bowling superbly compared to Clark's ordinary performance.