Didn't he take his 6 wicket haul in an OD game at the SCG? Or was it somewhere else?Similar to Steyn in that regard, seems to bowl better as the day goes on and he settles into a rhythm.
Also recall this is his first game at the SCG (at FC level or above, anyway)
Talk is that there's a massive contract with his name on it, to be announced soon.Hahahaha is Clarke really using a bat with no sponsor's stickers? Old school.
Aw. Enjoying seeing his stickerless batting, makes for quality nostalgia vibes.Didn't he take his 6 wicket haul in an OD game at the SCG? Or was it somewhere else?
Talk is that there's a massive contract with his name on it, to be announced soon.
Practiced with a Slazenger bat yesterday fwiw.Aw. Enjoying seeing his stickerless batting, makes for quality nostalgia vibes.
Do you know anywhere that has extended highlights in reasonable quality? The ones CATV provides are too short.Practiced with a Slazenger bat yesterday fwiw.
Just watched Kohli's out again just now. That was a cracking ball from Siddle.
Yeah Fox Sports has two hours each night mateDo you know anywhere that has extended highlights in reasonable quality? The ones CATV provides are too short.
Might be a rebadging underwaySshhh... say it quietly.
They're on atm.Yeah Fox Sports has two hours each night mate
Spoilsport.I seem to be alone amongst the neutrals in not really getting any satisfaction out of India losing. Make it a contest ffs, the first Test was great.
Australia are definitely on top and I'd obviously put money on them to win from here, but until the last hour it was a good day's play.I seem to be alone amongst the neutrals in not really getting any satisfaction out of India losing. Make it a contest ffs, the first Test was great.
Hmm, but even though it was good cricket for the first two tests England were still obviously the much better side. And it's been the same here, tbh.Australia are definitely on top and I'd obviously put money on them to win from here, but until the last hour it was a good day's play.
Reckon sometimes the result of a series tarnishes the quality of cricket. The first two tests between England and India was actually good cricket. However because it was 2-0 it seemed **** for a neutral (which is understandable, a close overall scoreline is better for interest). The last two tests of course were horrible.
Hopefully the same doesn't happen here, whereby India completely capitulate for the rest of the series in all facets, which can't be ruled out.
^this man has it sorted.Because this discussion is all about NZ.
awtaWW is just the new Flem.
don't ban me
Here as in Sydney? Yeah that is true. Not Melbourne until day 4.Hmm, but even though it was good cricket for the first two tests England were still obviously the much better side. And it's been the same here, tbh.
Australia still looked miles better in the first innings, things were just going sufficiently India's way to keep the game alive. Yadav got wickets despite being all over the place, two of Australia's top six got horrid decisions, Sehwag scored one of the worst 50s of all time. I backed India coming into the series but it didn't take too long of watching Pattinson and Hilf bowling and Laxman, Gambhir and Sehwag batting first time round to realise that was a mistake.Here as in Sydney? Yeah that is true. Not Melbourne until day 4.
Obviously as a neutral it's better seeing a see-saw/close series. But I think the cricket on the whole has been pretty good for the 5 days so far.