• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* First Test (Edgbaston, Birmingham) 16–20 June

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
AliTT, two PLFs that really were classics of their genre from Crawley and Bairstow. Can’t help thinking 450+ is a minimum though.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Why are they praising Cummins for not taking that review when it was obviously Carey who very firmly overruled Smith?
Captain's decision in the end tbf. He gets the blame when it goes wrong, so he should get the credit when they get it right. If he's just palming it off to someone who actually knows what he's talking about then he should get credit for that too.

**** me that's a good shot.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think he’s a slow wicket specialist plodder who doesn’t like it up him, but he deserves a hundred today. Batted very well.
well your view is so ridiculous, who gives a **** if you wish him well, just pumped a 97mph ball for 6.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Mate, I've just skim read the last few pages and it's horrendous from your lot......like eye bleedingly bad........and thats not even the wicket talk. Can hardly blame FJ for harking up here tbh
All anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.

then it’s been suggested in reply it’s actually the fusarium deck from 1972.

It’s been a weird day because the bowling has been very patchy on a generally unhelpful deck, but so has the batting. That’s the price you buy it at though.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
All anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.

then it’s been suggested in reply it’s actually the fusarium deck from 1972.

It’s been a weird day because the bowling has been very patchy on a generally unhelpful deck, but so has the batting. That’s the price you buy it at though.
that never remotely happened though
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Captain's decision in the end tbf. He gets the blame when it goes wrong, so he should get the credit when they get it right. If he's just palming it off to someone who actually knows what he's talking about then he should get credit for that too.

**** me that's a good shot.

Fair enough but Carey should get more credit for being the voice of reason with Labu and the Chump right next to him.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
All anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.

then it’s been suggested in reply it’s actually the fusarium deck from 1972.

It’s been a weird day because the bowling has been very patchy on a generally unhelpful deck, but so has the batting. That’s the price you buy it at though.
The deep fielders do **** me and I feel for the bowlers trying to bowl to a plan when there's singles all over the place. But to Cummins' credit Australia have never really lost control of the tempo of the game - which has nevertheless been very fast - in the way that past Australian sides have done so. It's clear that they really wanted to avoid the situation where a flurry of boundaries creates its own momentum, the crowd gets involved, heads start spinning etc etc.

It's very conservative cricket but there is a logic to it. I do wonder how it would have gone had England not been so... generous... in some of their batting though.
 

Top