Socerer 01
International Captain
what the **** root
**** off you complete and utter muppetWith Stokes' current form might be time for a new profile pic
Captain's decision in the end tbf. He gets the blame when it goes wrong, so he should get the credit when they get it right. If he's just palming it off to someone who actually knows what he's talking about then he should get credit for that too.Why are they praising Cummins for not taking that review when it was obviously Carey who very firmly overruled Smith?
well your view is so ridiculous, who gives a **** if you wish him well, just pumped a 97mph ball for 6.I think he’s a slow wicket specialist plodder who doesn’t like it up him, but he deserves a hundred today. Batted very well.
All anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.Mate, I've just skim read the last few pages and it's horrendous from your lot......like eye bleedingly bad........and thats not even the wicket talk. Can hardly blame FJ for harking up here tbh
that never remotely happened thoughAll anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.
then it’s been suggested in reply it’s actually the fusarium deck from 1972.
It’s been a weird day because the bowling has been very patchy on a generally unhelpful deck, but so has the batting. That’s the price you buy it at though.
Because it doesn’t matter what Carey says if Cummins decides he wants to take itWhy are they praising Cummins for not taking that review when it was obviously Carey who very firmly overruled Smith?
Captain's decision in the end tbf. He gets the blame when it goes wrong, so he should get the credit when they get it right. If he's just palming it off to someone who actually knows what he's talking about then he should get credit for that too.
**** me that's a good shot.
The deep fielders do **** me and I feel for the bowlers trying to bowl to a plan when there's singles all over the place. But to Cummins' credit Australia have never really lost control of the tempo of the game - which has nevertheless been very fast - in the way that past Australian sides have done so. It's clear that they really wanted to avoid the situation where a flurry of boundaries creates its own momentum, the crowd gets involved, heads start spinning etc etc.All anyone’s done is say the deck is flat, that and rightly call out the back fraud over rated batsmen.
then it’s been suggested in reply it’s actually the fusarium deck from 1972.
It’s been a weird day because the bowling has been very patchy on a generally unhelpful deck, but so has the batting. That’s the price you buy it at though.
You already hungover mate? Because even by your standards you’re being a surly bell end.well your view is so ridiculous, who gives a **** if you wish him well, just pumped a 97mph ball for 6.
whatLol broad thinks his kp now least Starc ain’t there to break his nose again
Chicken/egg innit. If England didn't decide they were doing this you'd do something different.It's very conservative cricket but there is a logic to it. I do wonder how it would have gone had England not been so... generous... in some of their batting though.