Really? I think, as a unit, Australia have bowled poorly. If they had hit their areas then England could easily have been 64-5. I'm OK with the score. Over 250 and I will be moderately pleased. Over 300 I will be extatic.No, not from an Australian perspective.
A regular Gary PrattI don't think Warner is in a short cover spot mainly for a loose Bell drive. He's probably there to create a run-out
or to dissuade English Batsmen from trying to impersonate Amla by physically threatening them...I don't think Warner is in a short cover spot mainly for a loose Bell drive. He's probably there to create a run-out
you can blame this on burginhoPush him back, throw a wide, full one in. Edge to Clarke
The outfield is fast and the ball is keeping low which really can aid the scoring. We haven't been amazing as a unit, but I think you are overrating how difficult the batting conditions are.Really? I think, as a unit, Australia have bowled poorly. If they had hit their areas then England could easily have been 64-5. I'm OK with the score. Over 250 and I will be moderately pleased. Over 300 I will be extatic.
Yep, its all to predictable really.I think we've been ****e in first tests for many a year now.
They're quality.**** i could go for one of those hogs breath cafe steaks.
Yeah, it could easily happen from here, especially if the Aus quicks get their line right.Time to stand up Bell and Bairstow, thought if we lost KP cheaply that Oz will be batting today, hope im wrong.
this is Peter Siddle's inner monologue**** i could go for one of those hogs breath cafe steaks.