• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* First Test at the Gabba

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!

What's your XI Morgie??
Out of the people in the squad....

1. Watson
2. Katich
3. Ponting
4. Khawaja
5. Clarke
6. Norff
7. Smith
8. Haddin
9. Johnson
10. Hilfenhaus
11. Bollinger

Wouldn't pick North usually, but I don't think Siddle or Doherty are up to it.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Out of the people in the squad....

1. Watson
2. Katich
3. Ponting
4. Khawaja
5. Clarke
6. Norff
7. Smith
8. Haddin
9. Johnson
10. Hilfenhaus
11. Bollinger

Wouldn't pick North usually, but I don't think Siddle or Doherty are up to it.
Smith's not in the squad anymore.
 

Noble One

International Vice-Captain
Out of the people in the squad....

1. Watson
2. Katich
3. Ponting
4. Khawaja
5. Clarke
6. Norff
7. Smith
8. Haddin
9. Johnson
10. Hilfenhaus
11. Bollinger

Wouldn't pick North usually, but I don't think Siddle or Doherty are up to it.
Smith as sole spinner would make a terrible selection. As poor a record Doherty has, I would back him over Smith in doing a good job with the ball. Smith if not taking wickets will concede too many runs and leave us a bowler short.
 

Ruckus

International Captain
Smith as sole spinner would make a terrible selection. As poor a record Doherty has, I would back him over Smith in doing a good job with the ball. Smith if not taking wickets will concede too many runs and leave us a bowler short.
Na I think the idea with that squad is that Smith, North etc. provide the spin options, whilst Watson and the other fast bowlers form the core of the attack. Smith would be there mainly to boost the batting. Personally I think that squad would be way better than the one we are going to have, because if anything will fail it will be our batting. But Smith is no longer in the equation so... yeah.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Smith's not in the squad anymore.
Just goes to show, the selectors see him as a specialist spinner for some reason. Cam White all over again...

Given that Clarke seems to be recovering - and Kahwaja wasn't in the squad earlier -looks like two spots between Bollinger, Doherty and Siddle. I'd play all the seamers if it were me.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Just goes to show, the selectors see him as a specialist spinner for some reason. Cam White all over again...
Don't see it that way, tbh. At least Smith is bowling for NSW, Cam White was captain for Vic and part-timers got more of the ball.

Thing is, the guy can definitely bowl spin. He just won't be Warnie or MacGill. Reminds me greatly of Peter Sleep.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
I would put more trust in North than Khawaja :unsure:
Can't see why you would. Khawaja may have failed in one tour match, but he has otherwise been very successful in every other match. Unless you think that the same competition that North averages 43 in and Khawaja 50+ is somehow different
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Could be. They still normally try and prepare a batting wicket for Tests down under though, so if there's some greenery it probably won't last much longer than the first session. Forecast is for early showers on the first two days, more sun at the weekend.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Aggers sais this morning it's just some grass that's been rolled into it, and it's definitely a bat first pitch.
Doesnt really matter tbh - after Edgbaston '05 and Oval '09, Oz are guaranteed to pick a spinner and bat first (if they win the toss) even if the pitch is the equivalent of Old MacDonald Farm's back paddock :(

Personally believe that the first day could set the tone for the whole series and Oz run the risk of losing it because of hangups over past mistakes

Eng dont have the same "issues" IMO and will simply judge a book by its cover
 

Faisal1985

International Vice-Captain
Doesnt really matter tbh - after Edgbaston '05 and Oval '09, Oz are guaranteed to pick a spinner and bat first (if they win the toss) even if the pitch is the equivalent of Old MacDonald Farm's back paddock :(

Personally believe that the first day could set the tone for the whole series and Oz run the risk of losing it because of hangups over past mistakes

Eng dont have the same "issues" IMO and will simply judge a book by its cover
From what i am hearing about the Gabba pitch, batting first could be suicide for Aussies.

Oh and did Clarkey found his balls? Stress ???? WTF.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Doesnt really matter tbh - after Edgbaston '05 and Oval '09, Oz are guaranteed to pick a spinner and bat first (if they win the toss) even if the pitch is the equivalent of Old MacDonald Farm's back paddock :(

Personally believe that the first day could set the tone for the whole series and Oz run the risk of losing it because of hangups over past mistakes

Eng dont have the same "issues" IMO and will simply judge a book by its cover
On the last 2 tours, Australia have ended day 1 364/2 after being inserted in 2002, and 343/3 in 2006.

Regardless of how the pitch looks, that's going to weigh massively on Strauss' mind should he win the toss.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
On the last 2 tours, Australia have ended day 1 364/2 after being inserted in 2002, and 343/3 in 2006.

Regardless of how the pitch looks, that's going to weigh massively on Strauss' mind should he win the toss.
The question is, are the 2002 and 2006 scores more to do with the pitch, or simply a case of questionable bowling against possibly the world's best ever batting lineup?
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
The question is, are the 2002 and 2006 scores more to do with the pitch, or simply a case of questionable bowling against possibly the world's best ever batting lineup?
Without doubt the second one, but IMO it's still going to weigh on Strauss' mind should he win the toss. Particularly given that 2002 happened after Nasser won the toss.
 

Top