Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Good kee.. stopping, Haddin.
Although if Hussey was caught first ball this match might have been over already.
All that's true as well. It goes both ways. It makes you appreciate though, that having the likes of McGrath and Warne made these "little events" largely irrelevant for Australia in their prime. They created enough opportunities that one would eventually be taken.And you could probably also say, given that England has batted so comfortably here, had Hussey's plumb LB been given and Australia only had a narrow lead, how good a position would England have been in now?
gagfNah.
Johnson is on form, isn't he? Scored a century and took a fifer in the last FC game he played in...harris is handy enough btw. better than MJ on current form.....
If he is, he isn't showing it today.....Johnson is on form, isn't he? Scored a century and took a fifer in the last FC game he played in...
Absolutely. Key is avoiding the English disease of losing the series after the 1st Test, same as 2009.Australia will get 200 in 50 overs on this. Comfortably.
England will not be thinking about calling time until the fag end of tomorrow afternoon, looking at 250+ in 30 overs, where all that Watson and Kat can hope to do is not get out.
Yeah, agree totally. It's hard enough for bowlers at the moment without some idiot deciding this ruling would be a good idea.wides from bouncers are becoming a joke, shouldn't even be a limit to shoulder high bouncers anyway.
lul? Hilfy's been as innocuous as Johnson ffs!"The two most effective seamers in the match have been Hilfenhaus and Anderson."
Wait - wut?
No mention of Siddle. Truly mind-boggling commentary.lul? Hilfy's been as innocuous as Johnson ffs!
Yeah, true.No mention of Siddle. Truly mind-boggling commentary.