• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Fifth Test (The Oval, London) 27-31 July

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Yeah or maybe the captain should choose the best bowler for the situation, not for some time factor
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The best bowler should be able to bowl his overs at a reasonable rate, regardless of situation. It's not unheard of for teams with 3 or 4 pacers to bowl 90 overs in a day.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
We all know Ashes, BG, and any big test series is a lot more important than WTC. So it shouldn't really matter.

We are all well aware that WTC is a dumb format for a variety of reasons. Each test is somehow worth the same even though teams are playing different no. of tests each series. Plus not everyone is playing everyone. Format is far from being fair and reasonable.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
There's no point of the clock if there's no tangible and impactful penalty for letting it run out.
I think the pretty obvious corollary to a bowling clock is that any delivery outside the time window is not a legitimate delivery.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
There's no point of the clock if there's no tangible and impactful penalty for letting it run out.
Clock is invisible. Automatic no ball if the bowler exceeds the time (paused for review discussions etc., maximum of one stoppage for field change every 5 overs)
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think the pretty obvious corollary to a bowling clock is that any delivery outside the time window is not a legitimate delivery.
That tampers the nature of a test match way, way more than docking points in the WTC.

I don't mind the current system. The penalty needs to be hefty enough. Otherwise teams are just not going to bother with it. And if it's big enough to elicit change people are going to moan about it being too harsh anyway, just as you are now. Can't win.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I was semi joking when suggested the other day but you could put a restriction on field changes mid-over
 

Spark

Global Moderator
That tampers the nature of a test match way, way more than docking points in the WTC.
The feedback would be instant and immediate. It would solve the problem rapidly the same way it has in those other two sports which faced the same issue for the same reason, and faced the same concerns.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Neither of these are particularly true
England would have had more overs to bowl out Australia in both tests. They would have had more overs to bat too and thus could have played slightly more reasonably/longer.

If Australia hadn't had that insane 4/11 collapse in 18 balls, this match would have gone to the last few overs.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
An easier solution is for umpires to be more vocal and make sure the teams bowl their overs in time! They could easily stop them from mucking around.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
England would have had more overs to bowl out Australia in both tests. They would have had more overs to bat too and thus could have played slightly more reasonably/longer.

If Australia hadn't had that insane 4/11 collapse in 18 balls, this match would have gone to the last few overs.
But they did so...
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
But they did so...
Good for England.

Draw should never have been a possibility given how fast England batted. It was only ever possible because of slow over-rates (& weather)

In total, at least 35 overs were lost due to poor over rates in the 5th Test!
 
Last edited:

Top