For me they got both wrong. It's a red, it's dangerous and he knew what he was doing. But it is on that snivelling little **** MacAllister so can see why they allowed it.Diaz was passive when Tarkowski played at the ball. Once Garner took possession Diaz had returned to an onside position.
That's always been the rule. Not even remotely controversial... maybe unless you're an Arsenal fan.
Edit: will add that ref was awful all game. I just hate dangerous tackles like that, no excuse for it not to be a red with VAR. The modern interpretation of 'reckless' is basically any situation where tackler isn't in control or "off his feet" and makes studs up contact above the ankle - it hits basically every criteria.
If Macca's studs are planted there it is likely a broken leg but we really shouldn't need to see that outcome to warrant that decision.
The quality (or lackthereof) seems to come in cycles. The thread had been great for years, but we also mustn't forget the days of Roseboy, Aussie, ScalyPiscine, and Marc. They were dire as well.I remember when this thread was actually enjoyable.
Still awaiting the semi auto offside var which was promised to be in place during the seasonFor me they got both wrong. It's a red, it's dangerous and he knew what he was doing. But it is on that snivelling little **** MacAllister so can see why they allowed it.
But it's also offside. If Diaz isn't standing there then Tarkowski doesn't have to play the ball, he's absolutely having an impact on the play by being there and it should've been chalked off.
Then you've got last night's fiasco at The Bridge where they took about 10 mins to decide if there was an offside or not and in the end made a decision on such a blurry image you couldn't tell anyway. There needs to be the equivalent of umpire's call, if it's that close you can't really tell, go with the onfield decision.
Only you can make it fun again!I remember when this thread was actually enjoyable.
Read on twitter we are trying to buy adra guler and Murillo.As we (Liverpool) are all but confirmed to win pl this year i would like slot and Edwards to buy these players in summer
Milos kerkez
One among kudus /cunha/mitoma
A dm to replace trent
A defender to replace vvd (piro hincapie from leverkusan /van hacle from brighton could be option)
Striker( amoura from wolfsburg or oshiman)
Wanna know opinion from fellow liverpool fans
Reflection of the league at the moment. Worst season ever, it's so boring when it's not competitive.I remember when this thread was actually enjoyable.
I don't disagree btw. I initially thought offside too but with the replay it made more sense why it stood. They can't just change the laws mid-game.For me they got both wrong. It's a red, it's dangerous and he knew what he was doing. But it is on that snivelling little **** MacAllister so can see why they allowed it.
But it's also offside. If Diaz isn't standing there then Tarkowski doesn't have to play the ball, he's absolutely having an impact on the play by being there and it should've been chalked off.
Then you've got last night's fiasco at The Bridge where they took about 10 mins to decide if there was an offside or not and in the end made a decision on such a blurry image you couldn't tell anyway. There needs to be the equivalent of umpire's call, if it's that close you can't really tell, go with the onfield decision.
I don't blame you. It's officially regarded as a 'rivalry' than a 'derby', but the point remains. You may know that it dates abck to a fractious cup tie in the late 1970s, but that doesn't really explain it anyway. I'm sticking to my view which I put here a couple of weeks ago that picking a fight with Brighton was a safer bet than doing that with Millwall, who are actually the nearest team to Palace.Palace/Brighton apparently being called a "derby" by is one of those things I've never understood.
Good point, even if I don't remember the first two at all. All I would add to @Pothas is that the 'ignore' function is a wonderful thing if another poster is not worth the time of your day.The quality (or lackthereof) seems to come in cycles. The thread had been great for years, but we also mustn't forget the days of Roseboy, Aussie, ScalyPiscine, and Marc. They were dire as well.
Yeah, you mentioned that in response to me. In theory, Millwall are my lots biggest rivals and it has a diabolical history in terms of violence. This dates to the times of the dockyards. Luckily, I am young enough to have avoided the worst of that. The relatively few times we have played each other in my time, games had huge police presence.I don't blame you. It's officially regarded as a 'rivalry' than a 'derby', but the point remains. You may know that it dates abck to a fractious cup tie in the late 1970s, but that doesn't really explain it anyway. I'm sticking to my view which I put here a couple of weeks ago that picking a fight with Brighton was a safer bet than doing that with Millwall, who are actually the nearest team to Palace.