• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** English Football Season 2019-20

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah but come on, reading between the lines that's exactly what it is.
That's exactly what it isn't. The origin of the policy was:

1. Government wants social distancing
2. But businesses that close for public health reasons lose out to businesses that put the public at risk
3. Furlough scheme allows businesses to close without either losing out or laying off staff

If the scheme only applied to businesses that are performing poorly, then it wouldn't work, because successful businesses would stay open and spread the virus. So they made it universal. It has nothing to do with bankruptcy protection. If that was the goal they'd have done something completely different.

Maybe it's becoming increasingly understood as a way of propping up businesses, and I can see the government adding in some means-testing so that that's what it becomes. But as of today it's definitely not what it is, either in letter or in spirit.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
so it would be better if the players were furloughed too? :ph34r:

plus the fact that the owners are millionaires are a red herring. Virgin trains will be furloughing people by the thousands but it doesn't mean that the money to pay for that should come out of Branson's bank account
It does imo. Bloke's a ****. :ph34r:
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
That's exactly what it isn't. The origin of the policy was:

1. Government wants social distancing
2. But businesses that close for public health reasons lose out to businesses that put the public at risk
3. Furlough scheme allows businesses to close without either losing out or laying off staff

If the scheme only applied to businesses that are performing poorly, then it wouldn't work, because successful businesses would stay open and spread the virus. So they made it universal. It has nothing to do with bankruptcy protection. If that was the goal they'd have done something completely different.

Maybe it's becoming increasingly understood as a way of propping up businesses, and I can see the government adding in some means-testing so that that's what it becomes. But as of today it's definitely not what it is, either in letter or in spirit.
Haha, I think you're giving a rather charitable assessment of the situation, but fair enough.
 

D/L

U19 Captain
Well, it obviously will differ from club to club, and the difference between clubs like Man Utd and Yeovil will obviously be massive, for instance. But the notion of a club with billionaire owners, for example, dipping into a pool of public funds to subsidise the wages of their non-playing staff (which, for arguments same, say the total value of is about £100k per week) whilst continuing to pay their players out of their own pockets (to a total tune of millions of pounds per week) will not sit well with a lot of people. Similar to millionaires who claim job-seeker's allowance and other unemployment benefits.
This.

Heck, two unexpected meetings of minds in the one day.

It is the spectacle of billionaires effectively helping themselves to public money that really sticks in the craw. Perhaps the government can do something retrospectively about this abuse of a necessarily hastily cobbled together policy.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
For those of you who like this sort of thing, its David Squires' take on football's response to the current crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...n-blaming-football-and-joel-bats-for-covid-19

I particularly liked Kyle Walker's support for small independent traders and Roman Abramovic's transformation as St Francis, but there's plenty to enjoy here.

EDIT
Not least the 'Clap for Kyle Walker' comment somewhere underneath the cartoon.
 
Last edited:

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
News coming out RE: Arsenal's players refusing to take a pay cut if they do not qualify for the next CL (whenever that is).

Sounds like club could end up in a pretty precarious situation, in more ways than one.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Was that when he made the draw for the League Cup semi-finals?
Apart from that, was it a good watch?
It was the League Cup Quarter Finals 1991. I had to Google his appearance having either not seen it before of having forgotten it.

It was interesting, but nothing much new. The fairly generic school boy genius goal scorer - what the hell am I doing in Italy - boo hoo I missed the World Cup Final - downward spiral into drinking. Then the resurgence of a new media career. I think he's currently very ill, so hopefully he'll pull through again.
 

cpr

International Coach
So it turns out, according to our neighbours, that our house was used as a stand in for Bobby Charlton's on some documentary/dramatisation about United. Going to have to bang through some of them to see if I can spot the place. Weirdly never got round to watching any of them before.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
Spurs have scrapped their intention to scrounge tax payers money and are paying all staff in full.
Klopp’s brave soldiers are getting a nice long rest.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
aye that was a good one

no doubt you were watching Malcolm MacDonald and his sideburns very closely
Not quite. Plymouth 4 Swindon 3 in the afternoon and Lynne Wilcox in the evening. Though it was spoilt about 20 years later when I found out that she'd been tampered with previously.
 

Top