• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2011-12

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Still can't believe Van Persie's miss. But the team were so gassed by the end, AC would probably have picked them off in extra time.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Was so hard to watch during the end... Arsenal know how to annoy a man, anywho, back to Unitedddd.
CDMs are a great bunch to hate. They really are. Schadenfreude or not it's still fun.

Although I wouldn't have begrudged them winning the tie against Milan.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Ah well, top effort really, was a really good performance. Just makes the total ineptitude showed in Milan last time round all the more annoying though.

Nevermind, won't have done their momentum any harm I suppose.
 

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Bloody proud of our recent performances tbh. Which makes the performances against Milan and Sunderland all the more galling.

Loving Rosicky3.0.
What RVP is doing trying to lift that rebound I'll never know.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Must have just been going through a massive purple patch in his first 4 months, because there's no other way to explain how rubbish he's been since.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Deadly.

Was a fun game. :) Thought going 4-2-4 at the end was a shambles, but as been mentioned, there wasn't much else Arsene could do.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
...it didn't work? There was no flow from defence to up front, so you long balled it, the exact opposite way of playing that you're so effective at, and had gotten you three goals until that point.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
With a limited time left on the clock and the other team putting everyone behind the ball, attempting to incisively pass your way through against a defence like Milan's will get you absolutely nowhere. Unless you're Barcelona.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Milan very noticeably didn't just try to get men behind the ball though. They absolutely dominated possession for the last 25 minutes of the match, Arsenal didn't get a sniff after RVP's miss, and while tiredness looked to me to be the significant reason for that, trying to play without a midfield definitely didn't help. They also became horribly narrow when Walcott and Ox came off, everyone was moving into the centre every time they went forward. The gameplan that had worked so well in the first half just went to pieces late on.
 
Last edited:

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Milan very noticeably didn't just try to get men behind the ball though. They absolutely dominated possession for the last 25 minutes of the match, Arsenal didn't get a sniff after RVP's miss, and while tiredness looked to me to be the significant reason for that, trying to play without a midfield definitely didn't help. They also became horribly narrow when Walcott and Ox came off, everyone was moving into the centre every time they went forward. The gameplan that had worked so well in the first half just went to pieces late on.
Well, when you don't have any available midfielders, playing without them is pretty much all one can do. You can't continue with a certain gameplan if you don't have the means to get it to work effectively after all. Given the circumstances I'd say throwing everyone up front was probably the best option.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah there weren't really any options that allowed the team to keep their shape, and Ox in particular clearly had to come off. It's just a pretty thoughtless tactic, the whole "oh we need a goal so let's bring on a striker" thing. It's the same tactic that saw Ferguson replace Scholes with Hernandez and hand control of the game to Liverpool in the FA cup match. Arsenal have a much more methodical style than any other Premiership team but it really comes back to bite them in situations where humping it long becomes the only option.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Has always been the way with Arsenal to some limited extent, in the Wenger years anyway. Remember about ten years ago, whenever there was a desperate situation Kanu would always be thrown on as a target man (which was always questionable seeing as he was one of the most skillful players in the side with the ball on the ground but nevermind), can't recall it working even once.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Yeah there weren't really any options that allowed the team to keep their shape, and Ox in particular clearly had to come off. It's just a pretty thoughtless tactic, the whole "oh we need a goal so let's bring on a striker" thing. It's the same tactic that saw Ferguson replace Scholes with Hernandez and hand control of the game to Liverpool in the FA cup match. Arsenal have a much more methodical style than any other Premiership team but it really comes back to bite them in situations where humping it long becomes the only option.
Chamberlain was injured though; it was hardly a tactical blunder. Wenger said himself in the post-match interview that they struggled in the last 20 minutes because they had too many strikers on the pitch.

Benayoun or Arteta being fit enough for the bench and a 20 minute cameo would have made a huge difference.
 

Top