roseboy64
Cricket Web Content Updater
True but punching is almost as effective. Ball's cleared and more often than not the danger subsides.Neil Pickup said:Catching ends the danger. Punching postpones it.
True but punching is almost as effective. Ball's cleared and more often than not the danger subsides.Neil Pickup said:Catching ends the danger. Punching postpones it.
someone so ignorant could watch the last england game and come to the same conclusion.From the little that I've seen he's nothing special.
Indeed............................................Scaly piscine said:Yep, as happened with Macedonia's first goal.
That's what happens when you're one of the biggest clubs in the world. Attracts people who know little about the club and the songs. Also, high ticket prices stop some fans from coming and those who do buy aren't interested in helping to create entertainment but rather be entertained. Just hope Glazer's debt clears soon enough to lower prices to allow the real fans back.marc71178 said:To be fair when I went OT we were back of the highest stand and had a perfect view.
Didin't stop it being the worst ground for atmosphere I've experienced.
No, sorry, that just isnt true, punching the ball means that the keeper has a total lack of control over the ball and its prone to ending up in the possession of the other team, a goal keeper should always catch the ball when he can rather than parry, david seaman was very good at this.True but punching is almost as effective. Ball's cleared and more often than not the danger subsides.
marc didnt mention the fans, and this problem has been around far longer than glazer, and in fact has nothing to do with him.That's what happens when you're one of the biggest clubs in the world. Attracts people who know little about the club and the songs. Also, high ticket prices stop some fans from coming and those who do buy aren't interested in helping to create entertainment but rather be entertained. Just hope Glazer's debt clears soon enough to lower prices to allow the real fans back.
All well and good, but this was an England game well before Glazer came onto the scene - so what excuse will you trot out now then?roseboy64 said:That's what happens when you're one of the biggest clubs in the world. Attracts people who know little about the club and the songs. Also, high ticket prices stop some fans from coming and those who do buy aren't interested in helping to create entertainment but rather be entertained. Just hope Glazer's debt clears soon enough to lower prices to allow the real fans back.
Must have lacked rugby league fans.marc71178 said:To be fair when I went OT we were back of the highest stand and had a perfect view.
Didin't stop it being the worst ground for atmosphere I've experienced.
Didn't say he looked bad but he was rather good. Nothing though to say he's better than Robinson definitively. At this stage though he'll probably be way better than Robinson in a few years.sledger said:someone so ignorant could watch the last england game and come to the same conclusion.
None. It has gotten worse though.marc71178 said:All well and good, but this was an England game well before Glazer came onto the scene - so what excuse will you trot out now then?
Fans create atmosphere?sledger said:marc didnt mention the fans, and this problem has been around far longer than glazer, and in fact has nothing to do with him.
In most grounds they do yes.roseboy64 said:Fans create atmosphere?
All that matters is that danger to a goal being scored is averted. There are lots of situations where it's best to punch though. Hmm...but if you're good enough you'd get there quick enough to catch it. I see your argument.sledger said:No, sorry, that just isnt true, punching the ball means that the keeper has a total lack of control over the ball and its prone to ending up in the possession of the other team, a goal keeper should always catch the ball when he can rather than parry, david seaman was very good at this.
Apparently sledger thinks so.Matteh said:Naah, it gets pumped out of a machine.
Along with Cahill as well i see Cahill = Gunroseboy64 said:Who said Solskjaer was past it? 4 goals. Tied 5th on scorers list.
Yes & yes. Clichy actually replaced Gallas without about ten minutes to go. Made a couple of decent tackles in that time. A couple of times Gallas was caught out of position as he does supplement the attack as an auxiliary winger. We got away with it against Watford (we were 3-0 up before they made Jens make a meaningful save), but against better oppo we could be caught out.sledger said:somewhat surprising really as since gallas has arrived its looked a lot better, was hoyte in to replace eboue? and did clichy make an appearance?