• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England vs Sri Lanka 21st August-10th September 2024

LangleyburyCCPlayer

First Class Debutant
May have got lucky a bit today, but that’s England’s first daddy hundred since Pope’s own one in India, the first at home since Crawley went berserk at Old Trafford
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
After a rubbish first half hour Sri Lanka have looked legitamately good since. You can see the thinking behind trying to construct a seam and swing attack under the conditions. And the England batting order suddenly looks a bit short.

That said it might be very encouraging for the bowlers. You would back players like Woakes and Potts to do damage here, just need to keep their lines.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
A few random thoughts.
I'm not convinced that Smith is really a test number 6 just yet.
Against a stronger attack, we wouldn't have made 150 in these conditions.
I fully expect Woakes to bag a hatful if conditions are the same when we bowl.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
That is awful from Woakes when the set batsman needs someone to stay with him. Sri Lanka have bowled better this morning but England's batting has been a bit tame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FBU

Howe_zat

Audio File
Hard to say what a ‘par’ score is for England considering they score more quickly but give away wickets cheaply. Sri Lanka bowled poorly yesterday, they’ll have a task on their hands to match what England end up with
Well the median 1st innings score after being put in to bat in England is 294, to give you a bit of a ballparker. It's about the same if you exclude pre-21st century tests.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Woakes has never quite decided whether he should bat like a proper batsman or lower-order chancer. I guess being in this team has pushed him towards the latter, but I always think he should play like the former. Such an underperformer.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Woakes has never quite decided whether he should bat like a proper batsman or lower-order chancer. I guess being in this team has pushed him towards the latter, but I always think he should play like the former. Such an underperformer.
He should definitely have looked to play the percentages there with the man at the other end on 150. Woakes isn't good v spin though. Good captaincy.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Woakes has never quite decided whether he should bat like a proper batsman or lower-order chancer. I guess being in this team has pushed him towards the latter, but I always think he should play like the former. Such an underperformer.
Especially when he's been pushed up the order to number 7
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
The official 17th best allrounder in the world to get things back on track.

...The official 17th best allrounder in the world has got out as I started typing this.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Woakes has never quite decided whether he should bat like a proper batsman or lower-order chancer. I guess being in this team has pushed him towards the latter, but I always think he should play like the former. Such an underperformer.
Big problem with Woakes's batting has always been how vulnerable he is to the short ball.

He's a really good player of spin technically though - rivals England's specialists IMO - so chipping a part timer to cover at home is pretty frustrating.
 

Top