Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's not a double standard really. It's a realization of two distinct standards. In the English game, Anderson is a frustrating bowler. In the significantly less staffed West Indian game, Edwards is quite encouraging.
Yeah, exactly. What Mr. Mx says is absolutely correct, but it only works when comparing West Indian to West Indian and Englishman to Englishman. When you're comparing England and the West Indies, the tendency is to think along the lines of, "The Windies have Edwards, who is an encouraging bowler, while England have Anderson, who is a frustrating bowler" when in reality Anderson is the better player.I think Uppercut's point is that the different ways of looking of similar players depending on the context of the team they are playing for gives people a tainted perspective on the actual quality of said team.
We'd automatically class "encouraging" as a more positive immediate thought than "frustrating" when trying to evaluate the sum of all the parts, even though the likely and potential output of those two players could be the same depending on which system they're coming from.