Pipe down you two, there's some quality cricket going on here. It's about time we got some in this series.You make suggestions that i should "go elsewhere" and accuse me of being some "banned member" (even though a mod has confirmed that i'm not) and you think i'm the "bad guy" here? , my tone wouldn't be so brash if you'd shown a little more respect in the first place, you wanna question someones future on this forum?, look in the mirror, i'm happy to have fruitful debates with people who are man enough to accept what they've said and not flip flop every two seconds thanks.
I don't show respect to people who make repeated idiotic posts. BTW, Cribb hasn't confirmed anything - he's given some possibilities.You make suggestions that i should "go elsewhere" and accuse me of being some "banned member" (even though a mod has confirmed that i'm not) and you think i'm the "bad guy" here? , my tone wouldn't be so brash if you'd shown a little more respect in the first place, you wanna question someones future on this forum?, look in the mirror, i'm happy to have fruitful debates with people who are man enough to accept what they've said and not flip flop every two seconds thanks.
The second one was Hinds. But yeah, wow.England spinners actually looking dangerous together. Suppose everything happens once, just wish they'd done it in India. Chanderpaul is playing a dangerous game, been agonisingly close to being caught twice now.
Yeah, way to ruin the tour thread, come on Richard you know better than thatPipe down you two, there's some quality cricket going on here. It's about time we got some in this series.
I still don't think so TBH. Maybe if that Chanderpaul 1st ball had carried.Oh my god, ****ting bricks, we might actually do this hey
Fractured spoof. Sorry, i mean torn hamstring.What exactly is Gayle's injury that saw him bowl in England's last innings, but not bat ?
So don't complain about my posts when that's the exact logic i've followedI don't show respect to people who make repeated idiotic posts.
Erm i'd think him responding to my prior post about your frivolous "accusation" and me still being able to post right now would give you a clue wouldn't it?BTW, Cribb hasn't confirmed anything - he's given some possibilities.
Well it doesn't really matter if you wish to remain in denial the bottom line is everyone can see it for themselves, you were making excuses, it's that simple.Nor do I accept I've said something I haven't, incidentally. I certainly don't accept I've said something because someone who wants to kick-up a fuss over something would like me to have said it.
Wft is this a school playground?.. , SPEAK FOR YOURSELF, you can ignore my posts till the cows come home because guess what?, I COULDN'T GIVE A MONKEYS.. , i'll talk about cricket as intelligently as anyone else here, but if people wanna take shots at me but can't handle a response then that's not my problem.Anyway, I imagine you'll be on most ignore-lists before too long, so I'm not going to be responding to any more of your posts unless there's very good reason. And in this thread, let's see whether this game turns-out interesting.
Yet he was bowling, go figureFractured spoof. Sorry, i mean torn hamstring.
No. He doesn't have banning powers.Erm i'd think him responding to my prior post about your frivolous "accusation" and me still being able to post right now would give you a clue wouldn't it?
You can see, others can't. Your vision is poor, others' isn't.Well it doesn't really matter if you wish to remain in denial the bottom line is everyone can see it for themselves, you were making excuses, it's that simple.
Let things go. It's mildly irritating.No. He doesn't have banning powers.
You can see, others can't. Your vision is poor, others' isn't.