Meh. It's sport, not academia.Hate idiots like Sreesanth, Ballotelli and Stokes ftr.
Yeah at least when you've got a road with a bit of pace and bounce the batsmen at least get value for their shots, this is just hideous to watch.Even as a dedicated Test cricket fan I find this stuff extraordinarily difficult to watch and follow - it just feels like we're going through the motions for five days with no team actually set on winning just batting and bowling inconsequentially until they shake hands. Up the quality of the pitches, or I'm outta here.
I see you've become familiar with irony.I love to see passion but idiocy gets tiresome after a while.
He's done nothing wrong, his job is to occupy the crease, if he got frustrated and played silly shots it would matter, yet he's took all these off-spin balls, which may be dangerous against left-handers and never looked like getting out.Kinda painful watching Brathwaite being completely incapable of working Root around.
yeah this how you get frustrated and play silly shots thoughHe's done nothing wrong, his job is to occupy the crease, if he got frustrated and played silly shots it would matter, yet he's took all these off-spin balls, which may be dangerous against left-handers and never looked like getting out.
He did slash one wide off offstump to Stokes after that period.yeah this how you get frustrated and play silly shots though
Result wise, yeah, I suppose it's good for Test cricket, as in, it isn't a one-sided mauling.. But if the play in between the start and the result is as mind-numbingly dull as this, then why not just turn on the news 5 days after the start to find out the result? I say I can speak for a few when I say I simply do not want to watch this. Which is not good for test cricket.Look Braithwaite has scored good runs against Saf and NZ before - the kid can play. There is nothing wrong with attritional cricket. All 3 (4) results are still possible at the end of day 4 - this is good for test cricket