Hobbs was 46. Chanderpaul is on the short list but I doubt he or anyone else will play long enough to beat Hobbs.Does anyone know who scored (and when) the most senior ton?
In other words: Is Shiv be the oldest centurion. And if not, does he have a chance to become it?
Ha, he doesn't even have the record among active players. Misbah has it. Also Gooch and Boycott ahead (well.... ahead....) of him on that list.Hobbs was 46. Chanderpaul is on the short list but I doubt he or anyone else will play long enough to beat Hobbs.
Records | Test matches | Batting records | Oldest player to score a hundred | ESPN Cricinfo
If he scores one today, he goes ahead of Misbah, and will be just behind Gooch and Boyks, can see him moving up the list myself, but yeah the top two seem well out of reach.Ha, he doesn't even have the record among active players. Misbah has it. Also Gooch and Boycott ahead (well.... ahead....) of him on that list.
No. Also given that it is ****ing hot right now.Is it a wise thing to do to start with Anderson (and Broad), if the new ball is due in 14 overs?
This seems a incidental opinion (if that's the right way to say it), not? Judging over his career, I'd say his shot selection is his conservative, but extremely reliable.Chanderpaul's scoring patterns are so odd. Seems to choose when to hit boundaries entirely arbitrarily.
Broad hardly got above 80 in his two overs too.Anderson bowling below 80 miles in the first spell really odd.
If you had to stare at James Tredwell's head for an extended period of time to make runs, you'd probably hit one to cover too.wtf chanders