luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
We know - and so does marc I suspect.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Lara wasn't out on 0 and I wouldn't call the 359 a chance per se.
We know - and so does marc I suspect.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Lara wasn't out on 0 and I wouldn't call the 359 a chance per se.
I can only speak for myself, but I imagine others would feel similar.Sehwag309 said:Would the West Indians forget the 3 Test Loss, and cheer upon this World Record, and currently England are 104-5...so will this win (if it's a win) cover the 3 test loss in mind?
But doesn't this speak to exactly what you wrote in your most recent article on Cricketweb? (Which was superb and heartfelt). Now fans will ignore the three massive defeats prior, and unfortunately so too will the selectors, and people will say, "Hey we can't be that bad, we put up 751/5, let's stay the course." And then this will happen again in the next series, and in fourth test, Lara will score another big one, and the cycle will continue. Let's hope not though!Mr Mxyzptlk said:I can only speak for myself, but I imagine others would feel similar.
I don't think this match could make up for the 3-0 margin by any means, but that's all in the past. The fact is that we (WI) can't do anything to change that now, so the players can only go forward and play what they face from now on. It certainly is surreal - 47/10 to 751/5.
Depends on how you look at it. The sensible fans will take it as it is - a flat wicket and a great batsman. I don't expect the West Indies to be a juggernaut from this point onward, but I do take some comfort from this game after the tears of the last few months.Lions81 said:But doesn't this speak to exactly what you wrote in your most recent article on Cricketweb? (Which was superb and heartfelt). Now fans will ignore the three massive defeats prior, and unfortunately so too will the selectors, and people will say, "Hey we can't be that bad, we put up 751/5, let's stay the course." And then this will happen again in the next series, and in fourth test, Lara will score another big one, and the cycle will continue. Let's hope not though!
Hehe funny that. I played Cricket 2004 (PS2) a few days ago (before Lara's innings started) and I got 439* with him in a team total of 4/779dec. against Australia. Don't think it was at Antigua thoughSehwag309 said:I imagined someone in Indian Team to make 400 in a Test Match, was only possible while closing my eyes. I also tried to make that score in the Cricket 2004 PC games, couldn't do it. Brian Lara did it in reality, atleast an Indian did it, (West Indian).
So would of Rikmarc71178 said:If Richard were here he'd be saying which innings - the 0, the 359 or the 41*?
He'd also be telling us how he told us so about Harmison...
which is precisely what he did today....and what hes been for the last few series. look if trescothick scores runs when the others fail in any test match outside the oval then i would never again call for his name to be dropped. i admit that this is only a temporary loss of form...but the fact is he hasnt been doing much when he was apparently in form.marc71178 said:If Trescothick scores runs here and others fail, then why should his be the name to be under fire?
then again lara has scored 4 times as many runs in this test than he had in the 1st 3Craig said:Well already G.Jones has scored more runs then Read in one Test then what Read did in three. Well I think their run aggregriate must be similar!
I'm sure lara might have got to 500 if it wasnt for the 4 hours of play lost on Day 1 as wellCraig said:So would of Rik
Congratulations Lara for being the first person to brake a world record twice. Now if my eyes fool me, was it Sobers who gave Lara a hug after getting it? I saw it on the news reel this morning.
They had Hayden on the 'Today' Show this morning (Breakfeast TV program on Ch 9 - the Aussies know about this) and he said he was going to contract Lara and congratulate him.
If we hadnt of lost 38 overs of rain (day 1) chances are he would of had (400) by the end of day 2.
I don't think so, unless he's put on some weight lately.Craig said:was it Sobers who gave Lara a hug after getting it? I saw it on the news reel this morning.
Wasn't it the PM?Mr Mxyzptlk said:I don't think so, unless he's put on some weight lately.
Indeed.luckyeddie said:Wasn't it the PM?
I know, I was in a wind-up mood last nightMr Mxyzptlk said:Lara wasn't out on 0 and I wouldn't call the 359 a chance per se.
Craig said:Well already G.Jones has scored more runs then Read in one Test then what Read did in three. Well I think their run aggregriate must be similar!
What is your obsession about the Oval?tooextracool said:look if trescothick scores runs when the others fail in any test match outside the oval
Intresting, that didn't stop you laying into Ed Smith after he had a couple poorish Tests at the likes of the death trap Trent Bridge last summer.marc71178 said:Yes, and Read played on 3 up and downer's whereas Jones has faced in the main part time spinners on a very flat wicket.
Well if the purists want their immaculate little keeper who cant bat, then let them have itRich2001 said:Intresting, that didn't stop you laying into Ed Smith after he had a couple poorish Tests at the likes of the death trap Trent Bridge last summer.
At the end of the day you might not want Jonesy there, but at least give him the credit of a good performance when he has had it rather than finding the smallest of excuses everytime... he went well over 700 runs before conceding a Bye and then hit the 3rd highest score of the inngs (so far), but yet can still do nothing right
what?? so u want someone who plays well once a yr and fails in every other test match in the squad?marc71178 said:What is your obsession about the Oval?
If he scores runs there when others fail, that's surely a reason to drop the others (seeing as the Oval is clearly so easy to play at)
People have favourite grounds - I imagine Lara might like Antigua a little bit.