PY
International Coach
My great-uncle has Norwegian satellite television here in the UK and there's more sports coverage on that than there is on the equivalent UK channels. About a third of the cost as well.Samuel_Vimes said:Move here :P
My great-uncle has Norwegian satellite television here in the UK and there's more sports coverage on that than there is on the equivalent UK channels. About a third of the cost as well.Samuel_Vimes said:Move here :P
Unfortunately, 94.7% is extreme whaling.PY said:My great-uncle has Norwegian satellite television here in the UK and there's more sports coverage on that than there is on the equivalent UK channels. About a third of the cost as well.
Neil Pickup said:Unfortunately, 94.7% is extreme whaling.
On wickets with some seam and some grass, Dwayne Smith is more then a handy bowler.Mr Mxyzptlk said:If both batsmen are about equal on contribution, I would pick the allrounder over the specialist in a heartbeat. That said, Powell will very likely get the call.
:wow: :ONeil Pickup said:Unfortunately, 94.7% is extreme whaling.
Neil Pickup said:Unfortunately, 94.7% is extreme whaling.
I think it's a bit rash to write Smith off as a test player after his impressive - albeit not entirely convincing - exploits in South Africa. I guess you mean that you don't YET rate him as test class, but that would apply to a number of players in the team, the squad and on the fringes of selection (including, naturally, Ryan Hinds and Powell).Mr Mxyzptlk said:My meaning is that I don't rate Dwayne Smith as a Test class player and I rate Hinds higher as a batsman. Therefore I would prefer to see him in there.
I still think that we need something approaching quality spin to support the seamers. Yes, we're picking four specialist seamers, but some variety would be nice too. I don't think Gayle's bowling is suited to doing anything but blocking an end in Tests (though Sarwan has some potential) and Hinds is clearly a better bowler than Powell.
If both batsmen are about equal on contribution, I would pick the allrounder over the specialist in a heartbeat. That said, Powell will very likely get the call.
Corey Collymore? Corey Feldman? Corey the mysterious cricketing seer? Who's Corey?Richard said:I have debated basically the point of the contents of this thread with Corey, and it has enlightened me beyond prediction.
Imaginary friend?????garage flower said:Corey Collymore? Corey Feldman? Corey the mysterious cricketing seer? Who's Corey?
Interesting debate by the way.
I wouldn't be surprised. An unusually intelligent imaginary friend though, judging by the "enlightened beyond prediction" comment. Sounds like something Gandalf would say.Swervy said:Imaginary friend?????
And ex-Australia U19 fringe player before a huge bust-up with the management.PY said:Corey = Top_Cat - Staff Member, Moderator who knows what he is talking about (even if he does use words that are too damn long :P ).
Read this thread before you make a fool out of yourself please.garage flower said:I wouldn't be surprised. An unusually intelligent imaginary friend though, judging by the "enlightened beyond prediction" comment. Sounds like something Gandalf would say.
Are you going to enlighten us Richard? Why should you hogg all the enlightening just because you've got a clever (made up) friend?!
lol, i'm afraid that isn't going to happen. This could be a gooden, come on England.garage flower said:Leaving work early now to watch the game. Come on the Windies!
Either 378/2 at close if they bat or England all out 125 (Sanford 8 for 15) and Windies 250/1 (Gayle 168 n.o. off 54).
Or something like that.