• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in the West Indies 2024

Beamer

International Vice-Captain
Next match drop Shamar and bring in Matthew Forde
I think we would have lost anyway given that ridiculous performance from Salt.

But Shamar is not a white ball bowler yet. He needs some domestic experience first. Alzarri comes in for him when he's back, that's an obvious one, but tomorrow I agree, Forde comes in.
 
I think we would have lost anyway given that ridiculous performance from Salt.

But Shamar is not a white ball bowler yet. He needs some domestic experience first. Alzarri comes in for him when he's back, that's an obvious one, but tomorrow I agree, Forde comes in.
At the moment, Sammy's plan for Shamar doesn't align with what Shamar want to do. I know that is a lot to say, but the role he is playing in this team is quite haphazard. Maybe this is something that Sammy's said to all his bowlers: multi-roles?

Anyways, Forde is a much better bowler in this white ball thing. He uses his variations well.

But, let's not take anything away from Phil Majestic Salt. He owned this chase.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Salt >>>> Jacks now then forever
Probably not even a discussion nowadays. The saddest thing about Jacks is that his game appears to have deteriorated rather than kicked on over the last couple of years.

Jacks certainly shouldn't be in the CT side, assuming that Duckett, Root, Brook and Buttler are available.

Anyway, cracking innings by Salt, and another valuable contribution by Bethell who, to use the dread phrase, seems to 'have something'.
 

LangleyburyCCPlayer

State 12th Man
Probably not even a discussion nowadays. The saddest thing about Jacks is that his game appears to have deteriorated rather than kicked on over the last couple of years.

Jacks certainly shouldn't be in the CT side, assuming that Duckett, Root, Brook and Buttler are available.

Anyway, cracking innings by Salt, and another valuable contribution by Bethell who, to use the dread phrase, seems to 'have something'.
Not sure Salt should be neither, sure, it’s great to see him hitting a ton here, but he’s struggled to get to grips with the longer format. Expect our CT squad to look very different to what we’ve been fielding of late, but it’s hard to know exactly how the likes of Root and possibly Stokes will adapt back to 50 over cricket
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not sure Salt should be neither, sure, it’s great to see him hitting a ton here, but he’s struggled to get to grips with the longer format. Expect our CT squad to look very different to what we’ve been fielding of late, but it’s hard to know exactly how the likes of Root and possibly Stokes will adapt back to 50 over cricket
Hmm, I think he gets the chance after the last 2 50s in the form, not convinced myself, but it's gonna be hard to bed in anyone else now, give him the CT, and if he fails look for someone else for the future, Banton or Crawley perhaps.

Obviously at T20 he is superb.
 
Usually when the top order struggle but the guys lower down the order smash runs, it’s a sign that the pitch isn’t bad!
Well, the wicket was playing fine, it's just that our batsmen all went gung-ho. There was no one in the middle-order who actually tried to stabilize the innings. Boundaries or bust. It got us to 180. Let's just say that the experiment somewhat worked. I don't condone the chaos.

I wouldn't be surprised if Hope or Chase features in today's match.
 

Nicky

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Hi everybody!
I was wondering why didn't Buttler open ? He wanted to give Jacks the chance?
I feel Salt & Buttler is a very threatening opening combination. Jacks at 3 would be ok, no ?
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
We’re on again…

A bit of life early in the pitch but plenty of boundaries available too. WI surely need 200 to have a chance.

Mahmood helping by bowling loads of wides.
 

Top