• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in Sri Lanka 2012

Migara

International Coach
England series shortened due to IPL- Nishantha Ranatunga

by Rex Clementine

Those men who claim that the interests of Sri Lankan cricket are best represented at global forums by Nishantha Ranatunga must get their heads examined. The damage the SLC Secretary is doing the board is beyond repair.

It’s a pity that it was Nishantha’s elder brother and World Cup winning Sri Lanka captain Arjuna who staunchly pushed for Sri Lanka’s case for a proper Test series against England. Although his exchanges with England were one-match affairs, by the time he retired in 2000, Lord’s had announced that England’s tour of Sri Lanka in 2001 will consist of a three-Test series and England will be hosting the islanders for a return three-match series the next summer.

The trend continued for four more series until Nishantha Ranatunga and D. S. de Silva were running cricket and the pair neglected their duties and settled for a two-Test series against what is world’s number one ranked team.

Soon after it was announced that England’s series against Sri Lanka will be a two-match affair in June, we contacted the ECB and were told that SLC had in fact not requested for a three-Test series.

"We did not receive a request from SLC to play three Test Matches and as host Board they would draw up the initial schedule for agreement by both countries," a spokesman told us in an e-mail.

At a time when SLC bigwigs are boasting about the millions they have made through the sale of tickets, they seem to have conveniently forgotten the billions they have lost through television revenue and tourism by not playing the additional Test Match and any ODIs.

In Galle last Sunday, we asked Nishantha Ranatunga the reason for the series being a two-match affair. We were informed that it was due to lack of time. When asked why the series had to be stopped on the 7th of April without continuing, Nishantha explained that the board had to end the series early due to the IPL!

Now then, this is the third time that monster called IPL has forced SLC to alter its plans limiting international cricket. All that talk by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that they will ensure that international cricket will take precedence over IPL is just an eyewash and BCCI wants lackeys like Nishantha who will ‘sir’ them and carry out their agendas holding key positions in other boards.

To add insult to injury, Sri Lanka’s next tour to England also has been reduced to two Tests and when asked the reason for this, Nishantha said that it’s due to tours being reciprocal. When you host two Tests, what you get seems two Tests as well.

What hurts is, people like Nishantha Ranatunga are not aware of the sacrifices and difficulties Sri Lanka had to go through to secure regular cricket tours from leading cricket playing nations.

West Indies for example didn’t host Sri Lanka for a Test Match until the island had won the World Cup! Thanks to men like Neil Perera, the marginalization of Sri Lanka was negated to a large extent in the 1980s and 1990s.

The men who are filling the boots of those illustrious men like Perera seem to be least bothered about the interests of Sri Lankan cricket. Their personal interests seem to be taking precedence above all else. If that’s not so, how can the CEO of a Sports Channel continue to remain as the Secretary of the board and continue to function in the capacity of CEO of SLC as well?

The government should probe why England’s Test series in Sri Lanka was reduced to two. But we doubt anything significant happening. If the government actually cared, they should have listened to former Sports Minister C. B. Ratnayake, who called the Nishantha Ranatunga and D. S. de Silva run cricket Interim Committee the third most corrupt institution in the country. The Minister was promptly removed and the crooks he named went much afterwards having pushed SLC into bankruptcy and some of them returned in style with full political backing in an election that was very well staged.

Reputation at stake –

SLC’s reputation is also at stake. But who cares? Those who matter seem to think that they would be able to get their way with smart maneuvering. Ahead of the Galle Test to stop protests from British fans and criticism from the British press, SLC said that all those who enter the ground, local or foreign had to pay Rs. 5000 as entrance fee. But by the second day there was a section opened for the locals free of charge. SLC’s reputation took a beating as an organisation that’s prepared to lie to meet its ends.

Wonderful cricket and affordable prices have been two reasons why British supporters turned up in their numbers for England tours here in 2001, 2003 and 2007. In 2001, the Tourism Ministry statistics stated that over 10,000 British fans witnessed the Galle Test!

But after being cheated by SLC, having had to pay Rs. 5000 for a day’s play of the Test Match, will the tourists make the trip to Sri Lanka the next time as well? Surely, there are cheaper opportunities available.

Another interesting aspect that we need to look at in that issue of reduction of the number of Test Matches from three to two is the role of players! Those who talk of Test cricket being the supreme form of the game, should be leading by example and at least make a voice.

After all, more than half of Sri Lanka’s current Test squad members do not have IPL contracts and thereby a majority of players aren’t gaining from that Indian tamasha. But what’s good for Sri Lankan cricket and what’s not, isn’t decided at Maitland Place any longer. Our cricket’s major decisions are taken from Perera Gardens at Battaramulla!

Source
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
The tours being reciprocal thing is rubbish - Sri Lanka's 2014 tour is 2 Tests because in England it's 7 Tests per summer and India are playing a 5 Test series in 2014.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I'm interested to know why you've agreed with him, or are you just being a bit of a douche, I don't remember anyone ever calling Rehman a chucker do you after he got loads of wickets against England.
The latter, one suspects.

Full credit to Herath, he was magnificent in the first test and showed there's more than one way to skin a cat. Spinners don't have to rag the ball three feet to be effective nor have "mystery" deliveries of (at best) dubious legality. Cricket bats cannot be more than four and a quarter inches wide, so movements of two or three inches to find or beat the edge can be enough.

Herath wheeled away and did just enough with the ball to induce the errors England seemed so desperate to give him.
 

LegendaryProtea

School Boy/Girl Captain
Why don't Sri Lanka just play three spinners? Their pace attack is really weak and it's just free runs for the English batsmen. All they need is Lakmal to operate with the new ball and have Herath/Dilshan bowling at the other end. Bowl the 3 spinners through the middle overs of the innings and if the ball starts to reverse, get Lakmal back on. The 2nd seamer for SL is playing the same role that the 2nd seamer played for PAK a couple of months ago, i.e. next to useless. Just bowling a handful of overs and conceding runs. I would be more encouraged to see SL play 3 spinners or if not that, play the extra batsman and use Dilshan more often.
 

Migara

International Coach
SL pacemen are **** yes, I agree. But that is with new bal. Once it starts reverse swinging, these are different creatures as shown in the aussie tour. And if the pitch gets real sluggish, spinners will not be effective at all, and some cutters at pace would be useful. SL pick pacemen keeping this on ming. Two spinners plus Dilshan is good enough IMO. Sam was a full time spinner with all the tricks up in his sleeve. He also can bowl a bit if variety is needed. But, with Mathews unable to bowl, it's best to play two front line pacemen.

Edit: And Eranga is expected to do better than Lakmal with the new and the old ball.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Whay was Prasana Jayawardene not playing in recent times for SL? as he been injured, or did they just prefer others?

I've always been impressed with him as a player tbh. Seems to have a great temperament, and his keeping is as good or better than anyone's around.
 

Migara

International Coach
Whay was Prasana Jayawardene not playing in recent times for SL? as he been injured, or did they just prefer others?

I've always been impressed with him as a player tbh. Seems to have a great temperament, and his keeping is as good or better than anyone's around.
Had a hernia surgery recently.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
SL pacemen are **** yes, I agree. But that is with new bal. Once it starts reverse swinging, these are different creatures as shown in the aussie tour. And if the pitch gets real sluggish, spinners will not be effective at all, and some cutters at pace would be useful. SL pick pacemen keeping this on ming. Two spinners plus Dilshan is good enough IMO. Sam was a full time spinner with all the tricks up in his sleeve. He also can bowl a bit if variety is needed. But, with Mathews unable to bowl, it's best to play two front line pacemen.

Edit: And Eranga is expected to do better than Lakmal with the new and the old ball.
Really? Herath was the major threat in the Aus tour as well IIRC.
 

Migara

International Coach
Really? Herath was the major threat in the Aus tour as well IIRC.
herath was the main tormentor, yes, but pacers did some damage too.

1st test: Welegedara 1/61 & 2/13, Lakmal 3/55 & 1/23
2nd test: Welegedara 1/74, Lakmal 2/102
3rd test: Welegedara 3/75 & 1/88, Eranga 4/65 & 1/62, Lakmal 2/60

out of 47 Aussie wickets 21 falling to pace, and other than for Eranga others achieved it through reverse swing.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Hmm, I dunno about that. I remember a lot of very loose flays at wide balls that didn't do much at all, that seemed to be the main problem.

Don't remember seeing a lot of reverse.
 

Lostman

State Captain
Prasad and Mathews coming in place of Chandimal and Welegedera.
Would have liked to see Eranga over Lakmal, but probably didn't want to bring in two new fast bowlers.

Sri Lanka will make two changes to their side with Angelo Mathews and Dhammika Prasad replacing Dinesh Chandimal and the injured Chanaka Welegedara. Jayawardene said Mathews would most likely to be played as a specialist batsman but had been bowling in the nets and added he would "see how he felt".
cricinfo
 

CWB304

U19 Cricketer
Prasad and Mathews coming in place of Chandimal and Welegedera.
Would have liked to see Eranga over Lakmal, but probably didn't want to bring in two new fast bowlers.

cricinfo
I don't see what Mathews has done to earn a spot ahead of Chandimal. Yes Dinesh played a couple of silly shots, but he should be perservered with as he has the priceless ability to take the game away from the opposition in a session and is fundamentally a very sound batsman who also happens to be capable of playing audacious shots.

England surely fear him more than Mathews, who doesn't seem to have much game intelligence. I have seen Angelo dawdle more than once when SL has needed quick runs. I have also seen him throw his wicket away mindlessly on more than one occasion when his team has desperately needed him to stay in and develop a partnership. He is a very sound batsman and I rate him, but I reckon Chandimal is something special and should play at 6 ahead of him. For me Mathews is an ideal solution to SL's opening problem.
 
Last edited:

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah I hadn't thought of Mathews opening but a few others have suggested it and I think it's a good idea. The only place he can fit in really.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It goes against all evidence that we have seen this winter but just got a feeling we are going to score 600 or something just to piss us all off.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah kinda feel the same. Reckon Strauss and Pietersen may get runs.

Although I definitely wouldn't be surprised if we get skittled for 200 each innings.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
would be really really embarrassing if England lose the upcoming match......that would be 5 straight defeats
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
I'm feeling fairly confident for tomorrow... our batting looked a lot better to me than in the UAE, basically Strauss (who hasn't been great for a while) and KP (could easily just suddenly smash 150) as major worries. Mind you, Broad gone is massive.
 

Top