• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in Sri Lanka 2012

uvelocity

International Coach
SL all out around lunch = arse nipper
they just aren't scoring quickly enough for this imo. And if I was England, I'd go all out and risk a series loss rather than draw, to keep the #1 and avoid the ignomy of not winning with the ranking on.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
they just aren't scoring quickly enough for this imo. And if I was England, I'd go all out and risk a series loss rather than draw, to keep the #1 and avoid the ignomy of not winning with the ranking on.
I think they'll speed up, especially if they lose another wicket. It's one thing for MJ and Samaraweera to toddle along at 2-an-over when they both know they're capable of batting like that for hours on end. It's quite different when you're down to the last 3, or maybe 4, wickets and you might as well set some sort of target to a side that failed to chase down 140 a few weeks ago.

But I agree with you about England's approach. No point in blocking if there's any sort of chance of a win.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
It's just speculation as we'll never know now, but even if Dilshan's edge hadn't shown up on Hotspot I still don't think it'd have been overturned. One cannot say, hand on heart, there's clear air between bat and ball. Front-on cam suggests edge, stump cam suggests none. Original decision stands whichever way it went.
Don't the DRS umpires have the enhanced audio on hand? I know they have done in the past when the TV audience don't get it.
 

Lostman

State Captain
It's now he's returned to the ranks and can give his normal personality full reign that one realises quite how much of an effort it must've been for Dilshan to keep his twattish tendencies (vaguely) under control.
Ha was thinking about this.
Some effort that was, glad to have the douchebag version back. Once he goes back to the obnoxious beard hopefully the runs will return as well.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Anyway, this is a dead-set cracking Test. Expecting to get a minor mauling in a chase of 93 or something, winning by 4 wickets.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Don't get me wrong; Jayawardene and Samaraweera are two of my favourite batsmen. I'm supporting England in this match though so I was really hoping a wicket or two had fallen while I was watching the rugby league.
Okey doke. And what's making you support England?
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Don't get me wrong; Jayawardene and Samaraweera are two of my favourite batsmen. I'm supporting England in this match though so I was really hoping a wicket or two had fallen while I was watching the rugby league.
Eeeuuuww. Samaraweera? Not one for the purists, IMHO. Somehow scores runs, but nah, not for me.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Eeeuuuww. Samaraweera? Not one for the purists, IMHO. Somehow scores runs, but nah, not for me.
"Favourite batsmen" and "favourite batsmen to watch" aren't always the same thing to me. Jayawardene belongs in the former category purely because he rates so highly in the latter; Samaraweera belongs because I've always felt him a bit under-rated.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
I love a gritty batsmen who might not always look like David Gower, but makes tough runs despite doubters. One of the reasons Alastair Cook is one of my favourite players.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Samaraweera belongs because I've always felt him a bit under-rated.
Depends whether the test is being played in the SC doesn't it?

beyond that, it'd be interesting to compare his stats before and after the attack in Pakistan, when, iirc, he was lucky to escape with his life. My impression is that he's picked up in recent years, maybe because that particular experience would leave anyone less worried about failing in their chosen sport and therefore more relaxed at the crease.

Of course, I could be talking complete bollox.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
If you're going to give someone a tag, expecting it to apply to every single minute of their careers is not a reasonable expectation. Good batsmen are not one-dimensional number generators.

The flat-track-bully tag applies to Samaraweera as much as anyone. Whether that tells you more about him or the tag is your business.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Depends whether the test is being played in the SC doesn't it?
I actually think he's more under-rated outside the subcontinent than inside it. Obviously he's a much better batsman at home but the way some people talk you'd think he had the record of a tailender outside the subcontinent when in fact he averages 41.

beyond that, it'd be interesting to compare his stats before and after the attack in Pakistan, when, iirc, he was lucky to escape with his life. My impression is that he's picked up in recent years, maybe because that particular experience would leave anyone less worried about failing in their chosen sport and therefore more relaxed at the crease.
He's definitely been better in the second half of his career than he was in the first half, but his sudden improvement had occurred a year or two before that event.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
I actually think he's more under-rated outside the subcontinent than inside it. Obviously he's a much better batsman at home but the way some people talk you'd think he had the record of a tailender outside the subcontinent when in fact he averages 41.

He's definitely been better in the second half of his career than he was in the first half, but his sudden improvement had occurred a year or two before that event.
Fair enough x 2.
 

Top