In 2009 he mainly played against WI, and in many of those matches you'd count the runs scored on a par with those scored against Bangladesh. To start with the pitches were the flattest ever, and then later on the WI couldn't give a flying **** about the matches.It's not like Pietersen has never played a special innings, or Smith never played a bad one. Form is temporary and all that. There's not a lot between them but Pietersen is the better batsman. He's just had his worse year in Test cricket and emerged from it with an average of 47 (for the calendar year that is)
I think Pietersen is at least on par with Smith, but you can't really argue with this ^.In 2009 he mainly played against WI, and in many of those matches you'd count the runs scored on a par with those scored against Bangladesh. To start with the pitches were the flattest ever, and then later on the WI couldn't give a flying **** about the matches.
Yeah, but my point was it was his worst year and he still hardly disgraced himself. He got loads of stick for his Ashes performances but he still made a couple of starts on one leg.In 2009 he mainly played against WI, and in many of those matches you'd count the runs scored on a par with those scored against Bangladesh. To start with the pitches were the flattest ever, and then later on the WI couldn't give a flying **** about the matches.
Yeah, all true enough.Yeah, but my point was it was his worst year and he still hardly disgraced himself. He got loads of stick for his Ashes performances but he still made a couple of starts on one leg.
He has scored runs pretty much wherever he has played for England, aside from here and Pakistan (he is unlikely to get a chance to put the latter right) and has scored a century against every team he has faced in Tests as far as I can remember. He has, year after year, been one of the most consistent batsmen in the world.
I agree with those who say he could be even better than he is but to listen to some you'd think he had Bradman potential with Ramprakash average. There is an argument for Smith being better but there's a strong one for KP being better too.
It's partly accent and partly image, I think. It's not just his accent that sets him apart from someone like Freddie, for example.Not aimed at you as I don't think it's the case in your case, but in this country I believe it is his accent that is the main reason for him not being appreciated like a man of his talent should be.
All of the above.So, has the pitch flattened out a fair bit? Or was it good batting or poor bowling?
Interesting. Is it any good in general, I've never bought it before?The Wisden Cricker had a big article on the differences betweek KP and Freddy this month actually.
Yeah, I don't buy it regularly. Just I was travelling to London so bought that to read along with FFT.Interesting. Is it any good in general, I've never bought it before?
The pitch was always going to be at its easiest on Days 2 & 3. By the time we bat again it's going to be the 2nd half of Day 4 'chasing' 550+ with a bunch of guys knackered after best part of 2 days in the field, facing a superior opening attack. I'll be astonished if the eventual margin of defeat is less than 250.Yes it's a very flat deck out there, especially if you don't take early wickets with the new ball. There has been a bit of reverse swing about, but both Smith and Amla countered it pretty well. The positive thing for England is that the pitch is playing so well, but a target of 400+ brings with it a fresh set of pressures.
What conclusions did they draw?The Wisden Cricker had a big article on the differences betweek KP and Freddy this month actually.
I'll pick out some quotes and paraphrase here and there.What conclusions did they draw?
A lot of that stuff about KP looks extremely similar to an article Corrin wrote not long ago actually. CricInfo not the only source mooching off us.I'll pick out some quotes and paraphrase here and there.
"Pietersen's devotion to excellence is the very attribute that alienates him from a fickle British cooper.
Apparently "throughout British history the underdog has trumped the genuine sportsman with a claim to greatness"
"The South African link will never allow him to become the Freddiesque man of the people he so craves to be"
Paul Burnham (founder of the Barmy Army "Flintoff is old school and England's fans can relate to that. Pietersen is probably yhe most misunderstood cricketer there is."Goes onto say Pietersen's confidence appears as arrogance but he's a friendly guy.
"KP would take a wine bar over a pub, he just enjoys that buzz and edge about being a top class sportsman.
"Wasn't brought up here so he still doesn't quite understand how things work and how people look upon celebraties"
"KP is considerably more guarfded with the media aftetr the Moores afair"
Then goes onto say nothing KP has done can rival Flintoff I.e turning up drunk for practice whilst captaining an Ashes tour. At least with KP it can be argued he acted with the team's best interest at heart in the Moores debacle.
"Perversely, though, the harder KP tries to ingratiate himself, the more the suspicions of his mostives grow whereas the more Flintoff strays from the straight and narrow, the more his stock appears to rise"
Freddie's willingness to hold his hands up and apologise is why we love him. For KP an apology is a sign of weakness, and as such is to be avoided at all cost.
"KP was furious at the way he was signled out for his shot at Cardiff - he wants to be loved but hasn't worked out how to achieve it"
KP "doesn't do banter well"
"As a team mate you see KP on the field but you don't see him around very much, he'll go out for dinner but keeps himself to himself, while Fred is willing to spend time with guys he knows when he runs into them" - Geraint Jones
There's more, need to do something now.