four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Why Smith > Pietersen exhibit no. 443598725890.
Why Smith > Pietersen exhibit no. 443598725890.
How about that.Smith has taken a back seat these past 30 minutes. I want Amla to get out in an hilarious manner so we can see some fat boy partnerships.
Was it seriously in doubt? I know some jokers can't see beyond KP's ability to play outrageous shots, but Smith's attitude puts him miles above Pietersen imo, especially as he has to face the new ball every time.Why Smith > Pietersen exhibit no. 443598725890.
That would have been a good idea in my opinion, but anyway. Kallis is out there.Rumour has it Kallis won't be coming in now so he will be on top form for bowling.
Yeah I would've been all for it had I not picked Kallis for most runs in the CricketWeb tipping comp.That would have been a good idea in my opinion, but anyway. Kallis is out there.
One side certainly deserves to, and it ain't SA. What we've seen today is a complete demonstration of why England's batting yesterday was so unacceptable. We were told beforehand that batting would be easiest on Days 2 & 3, and SA have been good enough to take advantage of that fact. If England's top 6 had use their brains, SA would have been facing a massive deficit and life would have been much harder. Instead, all they had to do was see of the new ball and enjoy themselves. Watch and learn Strauss, Cook, Trott, KP and Bell.Would be nice if both these sides lost.
Pietersen is probably more talented than Smith but talent is also useless if you can't use it correctly.It's not like Pietersen has never played a special innings, or Smith never played a bad one. Form is temporary and all that. There's not a lot between them but Pietersen is the better batsman. He's just had his worse year in Test cricket and emerged from it with an average of 47 (for the calendar year that is)