Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Could be an interesting selection for the next game, if Harmy is fit do they play him for Kabir Ali or do they rest him for another 2/3 days?
i think i just got it into my head after losing quite a few matches on Brian Lara Cricket by losing more wickets after drawing a gametwctopcat said:No, which is beyond me. When did that rule come into play?
they could only tie itSpeedKing said:England bowled well until the final overs but the Saffie's battery of hitters won it for them in the end.
I guess he must have a winning mentality, [SAFFIE BAIT]probably why he moved to England a few years ago...[/SAFFIE BAIT]SpeedKing said:another thing i found interesting was the way petersen was rallying the troops when things went just abit quiet and he leading most of the team talks in the closing overs
Future captain anyone
His English genes must be some very strong ones
there was coupleof games decide that way in ODI ithink both the games involve pakistan where the winner was decided based on the wicket lost after the scores where tiedScaly piscine said:It's used in some of the English domestic competitions (Twenty20 for one I *think*) and is usually one of the ways long down the list of splitting teams when there's a tie in the knockout stages of a World Cup.
yeah its quite an old fashioned way of doing it..and I never liked it when games were decided on wickets in hand..waste of time considering the sole objective is to score more runs in the 50 overs.Scaly piscine said:It's used in some of the English domestic competitions (Twenty20 for one I *think*) and is usually one of the ways long down the list of splitting teams when there's a tie in the knockout stages of a World Cup.
Yea this game reminded me of one a few years ago I was also listening to on the radio, SA needed 6-7 runs or something off the last over, Pollock was on strike and Ealham was bowling. Pollock got them with 2 sweeped 4s through fine leg.Swervy said:yeah its quite an old fashioned way of doing it..and I never liked it when games were decided on wickets in hand..waste of time considering the sole objective is to score more runs in the 50 overs.
A great game anyway...when Ali bowled that first ball I swore out loud in desparation for the guy, but England (not just Ali) really dug deep..and dare I say SA choked once again
I reckon you'd be right too!Swervy said:yeah its quite an old fashioned way of doing it..and I never liked it when games were decided on wickets in hand..waste of time considering the sole objective is to score more runs in the 50 overs.
A great game anyway...when Ali bowled that first ball I swore out loud in desparation for the guy, but England (not just Ali) really dug deep..and dare I say SA choked once again
Except not once did all 5 play together.tooextracool said:nope, mcmillan retired after the tour of england in 98, klusener made his debut in 96 in india, so they played as many as 6 series, including 2 against australia with each other in the side.
I have to say its pretty good all over SA everytime ive seen matches from there. Lucky sods!Langeveldt said:Wow this is tough going. This winter has turned into a bit of an ordeal.
Still its not all bad, Bloemfontein has turned into a crumpet capital of South Africa judging by the female activity on the banks
To be fair we need some relief from this constant thrashing and ridiculing.. You can't have everything.. And im still stuck in the UK, so its worst of both worldsSpaceMonkey said:I have to say its pretty good all over SA everytime ive seen matches from there. Lucky sods!