• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in South Africa 2019/20

wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
StephenZA said:
QDK first innings changed the nature of the match. Also when the SA change bowlers in the Eng first innings after lunch starting bowling decent line and length stuff. And a special mention for Maharaj in the 2nd innings who took the wickets of Sibley and Stokes at critical points and stopped Eng from gaining momentum.
Click to expand...
Sounds right to me. England's promising position on Day 1 was somewhat flattering as they hadn't actually bowled that well, and QDK was good enough to ride his luck and cash in.
 
Heboric

Heboric

International Regular
StephenZA said:
QDK first innings changed the nature of the match. Also when the SA change bowlers in the Eng first innings after lunch starting bowling decent line and length stuff. And a special mention for Maharaj in the 2nd innings who took the wickets of Sibley and Stokes at critical points and stopped Eng from gaining momentum.
Click to expand...
wpdavid said:
Sounds right to me. England's promising position on Day 1 was somewhat flattering as they hadn't actually bowled that well, and QDK was good enough to ride his luck and cash in.
Click to expand...
I also think that parrtnership between Nortje and RVD helped a lot
 
Lillian Thomson

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
England did most things wrong from the moment they won the toss. Even though the game was pretty much gone early they still bowled with supreme stupidity after almost sneaking back into it with four down in the SA second innings.

Shouldn't get too carried away with England bashing though. It should be remembered that South Africa have been struggling and they showed the right determination on the couple of occasions they were under pressure.
 
D

D/L

U19 Captain
wpdavid said:
Is that really what happened in our second innings? Buttler maybe, but he only had Broad for company by then. I know Burns was caught of a mis-timed hook, but he was hardly in one-day mode. I thought they were just too good for us yesterday. The match was lost on Days 1 & 2 really.
Click to expand...
I suppose "one day shots" may be over-simplifying it a bit. What I mean is shots that don't need to be played when there is plenty of tine in a test innings to just let some deliveries go through to the keeper. Wafting at deliveries outside the off stump has become a bit of a habit with some of our supposedly better batsmen.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
D/L said:
I suppose "one day shots" may be over-simplifying it a bit. What I mean is shots that don't need to be played when there is plenty of tine in a test innings to just let some deliveries go through to the keeper. Wafting at deliveries outside the off stump has become a bit of a habit with some of our supposedly better batsmen.
Click to expand...
tbh I didn't watch any of it, so I'm relying on the online commentaries. I guess that most dismissals will to some extent, involve an error in judgement or execution by the batsman. Against that, they are also out there to score some runs and there shouldn't be many freebies at this level. I'd be more critical if they had nicked off or holed out when their job had been to bat out Day 5 to save the match, but that wasn't the situation yesterday. I gather that Bairstow's dismissal wasn't great, but we all know he's completely out of sorts and shouldn't be there anyway. Maybe they should have done what you said against the 2nd new ball and look to cash in later.
 
Bijed

Bijed

International Regular
wpdavid said:
Is that really what happened in our second innings? Buttler maybe, but he only had Broad for company by then. I know Burns was caught of a mis-timed hook, but he was hardly in one-day mode. I thought they were just too good for us yesterday. The match was lost on Days 1 & 2 really.
Click to expand...
Buttler's shot did actually annoy me a bit tbh. I'm not going to single him out as he's hardly the only culprit over the last god-knows-how-long, but the impression I get is that once a game is beyond us some players sometimes see that as a reason to not bother playing properly, maybe to 'have a bit of fun'. I don't expect us to win, or even get particularly close, from the position we were in when Buttler was the only batsman left, but it would be nice to see an effort to at least make the opposition work a bit to finish things off.

I know I said earlier in the thread that Archer might as well just slog, but everyone else in the side (except maybe Broad these days) should be at least capable of trying to block for a bit
 
T

Tom Flint

International Regular
No Buttler was free to do as he pleased. Was the only way to get runs on the board. No one was slagging off stokes for reverse sweeping for 6 off Cummins when in a similar position
 
Bijed

Bijed

International Regular
Tom Flint said:
No Buttler was free to do as he pleased. Was the only way to get runs on the board. No one was slagging off stokes for reverse sweeping for 6 off Cummins when in a similar position
Click to expand...
Stokes was somewhat more played-in by that point though, having faced nearly 200 balls as opposed to Buttler's 30-odd. I'd have been saying the same as I am now about Buttler if Stokes had gone 6 and out just after Leach had arrived at the crease. And FWIW, whilst I ws obviously thrilled that he scooped Cummins for 6, at the time I hoped he didn't try to repeat the shot since I thought it had a good chance of going wrong.

I don't so much mind that Buttler decided to play more aggressively, but the shot he got out to was a filty wipe across the line. "Controlled aggression" is a phrase that's too often used after the fact, but it's possible to be a bit selective about how and when you try to smash a boundary. It didn't feel like he was going "well, if I capitalise of some scoring opportunities I can get us closer", more "well **** it, lets just have a dash and hope it comes off". The fact that Stokes pulled off a one-in-a-thousand chase with that mindset shouldn't mean it's our default approach whenever the scorecards look similar.
 
Gnske

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I hope Philander doesn't catch a disease or AIDS or something 10 minutes before the toss.
 
Heboric

Heboric

International Regular
I dont want to post a link because its written by Who Shall Not Be Named, but I think Bavuma has been dropped and sent back to franchise cricket to give Rassie a decent go
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top