Because piedt is preferred to both harmer and tahir. He was the preferred spinner before he hurt his shoulder and Amla & the management prefers him.Why is Harmer not playing this match?
Today imo actually illustrated why they dropped Compton. Today showed all that was good and bad with Compton's game.So happy for Compton.. Guy should never have been dropped.. F you Andy Flower.
Yes I too think Piedt is better than both.Because piedt is preferred to both harmer and tahir. He was the preferred spinner before he hurt his shoulder and Amla & the management prefers him.
Think Piedt is better then harmer personally & tahir is too lose for the way SA wants their spinner to operate so its the right choice.
Agree with all that, and of course the rule is they have to play four players of colour in the side. I genuinely do not know how they do that if Harmer was to play as you could not pick him ahead of one of the white fast bowlers, and if you were to pick him instead of Piedt, it would get very messy filling the required quota.Because piedt is preferred to both harmer and tahir. He was the preferred spinner before he hurt his shoulder and Amla & the management prefers him.
Think Piedt is better then harmer personally & tahir is too lose for the way SA wants their spinner to operate so its the right choice.
Given how often this England lineup tends to collapse in a heap, maybe range of strokeplay shouldn't be the priority when selecting an incoming batsman.Today imo actually illustrated why they dropped Compton. Today showed all that was good and bad with Compton's game.
The good is crease occupation and playing in toughish conditions.
The bad is that once the conditions and bowling eased he couldn't take advantage because he simply doesn't have the strokeplay (or maybe the inclination). And his is a style that puts a lot of pressure on the batsman at the other end to do the runscoring - and never puts the pressure on the opposition.
It's a trade off but one that illustrates that Compton was/is never going to be anything other than an average international batsman.
Last time he was batting between Cook and Trott who both had similar styles but were much better than Compton. Cook and Trott are one paced but they were much more clinical and had a range of shots that brought them a lot of runs. England wanted a contrast of styles and Root who had opened his whole county career was thought of as a better option. It didn't quite work out (although Root averaged more as an opener than Compton did) but I still think they made the correct decision.
Agree with you there. People say he was too slow but he was still better than the other options they tried after dropping him.So happy for Compton.. Guy should never have been dropped.. F you Andy Flower.
And I was referring to why they dropped him in the first place when that was far less of an issue as the team was built around world class players in Cook, Trott, KP and PriorGiven how often this England lineup tends to collapse in a heap, maybe range of strokeplay shouldn't be the priority when selecting an incoming batsman.
He wouldn't have helped ease the incompetence against spin which was the real problem.Steyn bowling beautifuly here, one wonders how different the india tour might have been had steyn been fit for most of it, particularly as india seemed to struggle with the reversing ball and steyn is one of the best exponents of reverse swing
He wouldn't have helped ease the incompetence against spin which was the real problem.
South African radars are often on the slow side. Steyn, Philander and Morkel always seem to clock faster away from home and touring bowlers often clock slower than you'd expect.You're still wrong because he said that Steyn looks like he's bowling quicker than 133. And he does.
Compton's SR in FC cricket is 47. This isn't that far removed from Root who strikes 55. I think that his low Test match SR has more to do with England losing early wickets and that he is also trying to cement his place in the team after only 9 Tests.Today imo actually illustrated why they dropped Compton. Today showed all that was good and bad with Compton's game.
The good is crease occupation and playing in toughish conditions.
The bad is that once the conditions and bowling eased he couldn't take advantage because he simply doesn't have the strokeplay (or maybe the inclination). And his is a style that puts a lot of pressure on the batsman at the other end to do the runscoring - and never puts the pressure on the opposition.
It's a trade off but one that illustrates that Compton was/is never going to be anything other than an average international batsman.
Last time he was batting between Cook and Trott who both had similar styles but were much better than Compton. Cook and Trott are one paced but they were much more clinical and had a range of shots that brought them a lot of runs. England wanted a contrast of styles and Root who had opened his whole county career was thought of as a better option. It didn't quite work out (although Root averaged more as an opener than Compton did) but I still think they made the correct decision.
It's not really about strike rate. It's about strike rotation (which obviously contributes) and having enough scoring areas that you make life hard for the captain + bowler to contain you, rather than knowing they can just bowl in one spot and get a clamp on. See early Khawaja, Usman.Compton's SR in FC cricket is 47. This isn't that far removed from Root who strikes 55. I think that his low Test match SR has more to do with England losing early wickets and that he is also trying to cement his place in the team after only 9 Tests.
Nice to see Taylor make a decent score under pressure.