I'm still trying to work out what Jordan is in the English team for tbh. After his shambolic first ODI, he now bowls 5 overs and bats at number 8. Surely you have someone who could use his spot better?
I'm not a huge Jordan fan, but he bowled pretty well today. Would have bowled more if the pitch hadn't been as slow as it was. Plus he's an absolute beast fielder.
... I still think this England side have too many bowlers though.
Disagree completely, having options is really important these days. If someone bowls 10 overs it should be because they really should, not because they were forced to.
I think it's a double standard to recognise that teams will bat differently and bowl differently in ODIs compared to tests, but not recognise that team composition will be different as well. Depth in batting and bowling is much more important and fielding is vastly more important.
Jordan adds to all that, it will be in a very non-glamorous way when both Moeen and Stokes bowl well, but sometimes it is going to be his day.
Compare him to Ben Stokes for example, who basically everyone agrees should be part of the side. If Stokes bowls 5 overs for 30 runs then you don't question it, despite him averaging in the 20s with the bat, because you know how valuable he can be when he gets it right and he fields like a jet.
Jordan isn't as good as Stokes with the bat obviously, but he is part of a deep batting order that I think collectively gives England an advantage. All their big scores in the last year have come with some runs from the lower order (and made using the confidence that the batsmen above have in it). He is roughly as good with the ball, having taken five wicket hauls against Sri Lanka, and has produced overs like that super over against Pakistan which no one else in the England set up can do - we
might need to call on him for some of that. He also fields like a jet, if anything his catching is even better than Stokes'. His catch to get rid of De Villiers today could well win us this match.
I don't think he is 100% safe in the team by all means, but I don't think I've seen an England cricketer get so much undeserved hate, and I think claims that he contributes nothing betray a real lack of thought into what goes into an ODI team. England have been criticized constantly in the past for not treating ODI cricket like the modern game it is - now that they are quite clearly doing that, let's give them some credit.