Well I dont really think that English attack did ok without Jones, First time in the series both the aussie openeds scored centuries...tells a lot about how they fared.twctopcat said:
Doesn't need a reply.aussie said:
no dawg work with me on this thing, it has always puzzled me a bit, one is right-handed the other is left thus when they deliver their stock delivery (the off-break) or top-spinner it would turn in differenty for a right or left-hander. Thats why i wonder why the SLA bowler just cant be called a left-handed offieNeil Pickup said:
How good was it today when they tore Australia to shreds (again), Sanz?Sanz said:
Getting him out of the restaurant is impossible.Sanz said:
twctopcat said:Lol, i thought that this ashes series was pretty good for rash statements but i can see that this one will comfortably beat it!!! Your boys haven't seen anything like our bowlers and won't be able to handle it. I just keep dreaming of Jones' reversing it round corners. Roll on November.
). plus the debate was who would win the hitting battle, and after it was established subconciously that its afridi, for some reason the debate drove to whos the better batsmen. people need to make up their mindsss.
Have u ever seen Umar Gul bowling?Umar Gul is always successful on Pakistani wickets because unlike Ahktar,Sami& Shabbir,he is a seamer and the only weapon he has is his beautiful swing bowling with which he destroyed the indians last year.When i watches Rao 3 years ago,he was as quick as Sami,if not Akhtar.But now,he neither has speed nor swing and variety.Thats why,I always prefer Gul over the other young seamers.aliG said:
Again living in the past. I love the enthusiasm of the pakistani supporters, brilliant. But i don't believe a single word of it. I think anyone with an iota of a cricketing brain knows that England starts as favourites because - shock horror - we've got the better team.aliG said:and england will choke like THIS in close games. aaah memories.
