social
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Im awake.luckyeddie said:Sssshhhhhhhhh. You'll wake social
Baby-sitting duties are going to be the death of me.
Wicket looks flat but already bowlers are generating big spike marks.
Im awake.luckyeddie said:Sssshhhhhhhhh. You'll wake social
Look on the bright side - the first three years are the worst.social said:Im awake.
Baby-sitting duties are going to be the death of me.
Wicket looks flat but already bowlers are generating big spike marks.
Thats not a fair comparison. In 99 Aus were untouchable anyone could have been whitewashed though we were unlucky to lose at Hobart in 02 it was basically Aus vs Pak A and the current Pak team have improved quite a bit since the last aussie summer Akmal,kaneria,younis they have all come of age and Pak waz without Inzi in that seriesOrignally Posted By Lucky Eddie
England only took Australia's scalp this summer. The last time Pakistan did so much as draw a game with them was 10 tests ago, in 1998 or so.
It's as fair as someone suggesting that England's confidence is likely to be low for one reason or another. That's all I was trying to infer.Xuhaib said:Thats not a fair comparison. In 99 Aus were untouchable anyone could have been whitewashed though we were unlucky to lose at Hobart in 02 it was basically Aus vs Pak A and the current Pak team have improved quite a bit since the last aussie summer Akmal,kaneria,younis they have all come of age and Pak waz without Inzi in that series
maybe it was the cricinfo guy they are aimed atsuperkingdave said:bit of swing first up
why are sky showing that stupid talk to frank ad in the breaks, do they think theres a lot of druggies up for this one?
cricinfo said:Hoggard will contineou after drinsks
You're actually complaining? You're 38-0 after an hour and you're complaining?Shoaib said:Its ridiculous that Pakistan have maintained a R/R of below 2.50 & its mainly because of Salman Butt who is batting with S/R of around 20.
Perhaps that's indicative of how accurate the England bowlers have been? There's not exactly been much loose to have a go at - besides, that wristy flick through the covers off Flintoff stood out as the shot of the morning.Shoaib said:Its ridiculous that Pakistan have maintained a R/R of below 2.50 & its mainly because of Salman Butt who is batting with S/R of around 20.
Dude, in case you didn't know, They are playing a TEST match.Shoaib said:Its ridiculous that Pakistan have maintained a R/R of below 2.50 & its mainly because of Salman Butt who is batting with S/R of around 20.
luckyeddie said:I suggest you go to bed for a month. I'll give you a shout when the one-dayers come on.
But anything below 3.0 is too low considering sides like Australia try to maintain a run rate of 3.5-4.0 in test matches.If Pakistan maintain their current R/R,they'll hardly score 250 by the end of the day.Sanz said:Dude, in case you didn't know, They are playing a TEST match.
You have obviously been brought up on a diet of instant cricket, so I suppose it's not your fault. Besides, after Hoggard and Harmison came out of the attack, the batsmen profited from some profligate bowling.Shoaib said:But anything below 3.0 is too low considering sides like Australia try to maintain a run rate of 3.5-4.0 in test matches.If Pakistan maintain their current R/R,they'll hardly score 250 by the end of the day.