Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Presume we won't be seeing you up as late as the last game then?Nope. Back now until March 20.
That's a maiden from Martin, not something I was exactly expecting to see.
Presume we won't be seeing you up as late as the last game then?Nope. Back now until March 20.
Yeah, fair points both and probably both came into play when they ultimately decided to field first. On such a batting strip, I would have done otherwise as putting runs on the board puts pressure on the opponents but there is a definite case to field first as well as you pointed out.New Zealand's theory is that they are a better chasing side, no matter what the condition of the pitch (see Chappell-Hadlee series 2006/07). Also I guess they considered that the side chasing had won all three games so far this series.
Neither team in this series is a competent setting side. Whoever goes out to bat will be thinking, "whatever we get, they'll get more" - and whoever's chasing will be thinking "whatever they get we'll get more."Still don't get why New Zealand selected to field on this batting beauty. Might just be handing the game to the English with such a blunder. If England get the runs on the board, which they very well can here, all the pressure will be on the Kiwis.
I probably shouldn't be up now as I've not had sufficient sleep this week. I'm likely to stick about until Mustard gets out as Ian Bell batting makes me angry at present...Presume we won't be seeing you up as late as the last game then?
That's a maiden from Martin, not something I was exactly expecting to see.
So would I, but in recent times we've been intent on chasing no matter what given what occurred against Australia last season. As I said before though, England should make 300 considering the conditions and no matter what your line up or past ability to chase big scores, it'll take some getting if the England do make a large total.Yeah, fair points both and probably both came into play when they ultimately decided to field first. On such a batting strip, I would have done otherwise as putting runs on the board puts pressure on the opponents but there is a definite case to field first as well as you pointed out.
Let's hope for your kids' sake as well as England's WC2011 prospects that Mustard goes soon then.I probably shouldn't be up now as I've not had sufficient sleep this week. I'm likely to stick about until Mustard gets out as Ian Bell batting makes me angry at present...
Welllll, not neccessarily. If we bowl as poorly as we're well capable of doing and Ryder and McCullum get going again, it could be over in 40 if we "only" set 300.So would I, but in recent times we've been intent on chasing no matter what given what occurred against Australia last season. As I said before though, England should make 300 considering the conditions and no matter what your line up or past ability to chase big scores, it'll take some getting if the England do make a large total.
AWTAAlso it's great that it's a 10pm start BST, can finally watch some cricket for a good 3/4 hours.
Err, I will debate with whoever I wish. There is no point in getting into a meaningless debate with you though when you sit on your high horse and think things in black and white though, and thus, I cease to debate with you on the given topic.So don't debate.
What's annoying is when, later in the tour, after the First Test has started at that time, the start time goes back and back as the clocks go back and forwards in the respective countries.Also it's great that it's a 10pm start BST, can finally watch some cricket for a good 3/4 hours.
Haha, as wonderful as it would be, I'm not so sure even we could chase 300 in 40 overs. Broad, Anderson and Sidebottom seemed to be adjusting better in Auckland so I wouldn't bet on a repeat of Hamilton.Welllll, not neccessarily. If we bowl as poorly as we're well capable of doing and Ryder and McCullum get going again, it could be over in 40 if we "only" set 300.
Exactly what I was saying. But I wasn't sitting on any high horses at all, however it may have seemed.Err, I will debate with whoever I wish. There is no point in getting into a meaningless debate with you though when you sit on your high horse and think things in black and white though, and thus, I cease to debate with you on the given topic.
Nope, nor would I, but past experience has taught me never to believe Anderson and Broad (never mind the rest) are incapable of wild inaccuracies at any given time.Haha, as wonderful as it would be, I'm not so sure even we could chase 300 in 40 overs. Broad, Anderson and Sidebottom seemed to be adjusting better in Auckland so I wouldn't bet on a repeat of Hamilton.
Just speaking of choice of music, thought it was a bit ironic that after Sidebottom had completed his spell at Auckland the song with the lyrics "Get a haircut..and get a real job" was played.Nope, nor would I, but past experience has taught me never to believe Anderson and Broad (never mind the rest) are incapable of wild inaccuracies at any given time.
And as I said in the last game, NZC's choice of music is certainly far, far more wide-ranging than that anywhere else. In recent overs we've had Joe Jackson, The Police and someone else I can't remember.
And the first bowling change of the day as Oram comes on.