You can force the bowlers to try something different and not to settle down. If you keep defending against spinners with close-in catchers, sooner or later one good delivery will lead to the dismissalI don't understand why commentators always like the batsman to be aggressive in these situations. Runs are no longer part of the equation FFS. You can't reap the benefits of playing aggressively if the runs don't mean anything.
It shouldn't be though should it. England have to go at nearly five an over for 2 and a half sessions to win here, so if they simply meander along at 2 and a half an over, putting away the odd bad ball, it doesn't really get them anywhere and doesn't force a captain to remove attacking fielders.Depends how they're scoring. If they're trying to blast you then that's risky stroke play and you're in the game. Ones and twos punctuated by the odd boundary is depressing.
It is 13 overs away so should be available before lunchThankfully for NZ Boult looks in good rhythm. Stating the obvious here, but crucial the second new-ball swings for NZ. It's only 25 overs away so should be available shortly after lunch.
I was reffering to a run rate of about 3 with plenty of singles. It looks much more comfortable than blocking to the opposition and if a batsman makes conditions look easy the captain needs to have a long hard think about the field, whereas just blocking means the captain can pitch a tent on all out attack because he's being given nothing to think about.It shouldn't be though should it. England have to go at nearly five an over for 2 and a half sessions to win here, so if they simply meander along at 2 and a half an over, putting away the odd bad ball, it doesn't really get them anywhere and doesn't force a captain to remove attacking fielders.