Stats don't care about what each of your hundreds meant. Not that I'm condoning what India is doing... I simply don't think we can win. And clearly, neither does Dhoni. At any rate, the crowd will probably enjoy watching Yuvraj/Gambhir and Dhoni bat more than they will enjoy the English batsmen mucking around for a few hours to get to 100/2 from 40 overs.That's the most pathetic way to get a hundred - completely meaningless and they really should be ashamed of themselves. It's poor spirit and poor gamesmanship, and it's cheating the audience at the game and at home out of a contest of any sort.
I don't think Australia or SA would ever do something of this sort. Get the **** off the pitch and bowl already. This totally reeks of the impotent, cowardly, spineless India from a decade or so ago.
England hit 407 in 79.2 overs V Australia at Edgbaston 2005, 1st innings. I'm sure it's happened elsewhere as well.Obviously impossible is an exaggeration but it's entirely unrealistic. If Greenidge's Lord's show in 1984 hadn't happened, it's virtually inconceivable it ever would have - it's very likely it never will again.
Scoring at 5-an-over for 70 overs is almost unheard of at any stage in a Test, never mind when you (and more significantly, your opponents) know you need to to win a game.
saffies scored well above 5 p.o irst day of test vs pakistan i think.
Yeah, it'll have happened once or twice but I said almost never.England hit 407 in 79.2 overs V Australia at Edgbaston 2005, 1st innings. I'm sure it's happened elsewhere as well.